Status and phase
Conditions
Treatments
Study type
Funder types
Identifiers
About
RATIONALE: It is not yet known whether pleurodesis using a chest tube with infusions of talc is more effective in improving quality of life than pleurodesis using a small catheter in treating malignant pleural effusion.
PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of a chest tube and talc with that of a small catheter in treating malignant pleural effusion in patients who have cancer.
Full description
OBJECTIVES:
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to inpatient status (yes vs no), disease type (breast vs lung vs other), and concurrent systemic chemotherapy (yes vs no). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
Quality of life and dyspnea are assessed at baseline and then at 7-14 and 30-37 days after treatment.
Patients are followed at 30 and 60 days.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
Radiologic evidence of a unilateral malignant pleural effusion requiring sclerosis or ongoing drainage because it is symptomatic (dyspnea and/or progressive fatigue)
Histologically or cytologically confirmed solid tumor or hematologic malignancy
Pleural spaces must be naive to pleurodesis attempts
No prior intrapleural therapy (defined as a chest tube in place or placed to drain an effusion, prior surgical pleurectomy, or any prior chemical or mechanical pleurodesis on the ipsilateral side)
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
Age
Performance status
Hematopoietic
Pulmonary
Other
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
Chemotherapy
Radiotherapy
Surgery
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
67 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal