Status
Conditions
Treatments
Study type
Funder types
Identifiers
About
RATIONALE: Diagnostic procedures, such as an urgent chest x-ray, may help in planning cancer treatment. It is not yet known whether standard medical care is more effective than an urgent x-ray in diagnosing lung cancer in smokers with chest symptoms who are older than 60 years.
PURPOSE: This randomized clinical trial is studying standard medical care to see how well it works compared with an urgent chest x-ray in diagnosing lung cancer in smokers with chest symptoms who are older than 60 years.
Full description
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
Secondary
OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
General practitioners from South East Wales are surveyed to assess their level of interest in the proposed full trial. For the feasibility study, 20 South East Wales general practices and 6 South Yorkshire general practices are selected. General practitioners are trained to recruit all patients who fulfill the extra-NICE criteria as well as those who do not.
Patients complete questionnaires (HADS, EQ-5D, and ICECAP[O]) at baseline and at 2 months to measure quality of life and health economic analysis of the cost-effectiveness of extra-NICE guidelines.
Peer Reviewed and Funded or Endorsed by Cancer Research UK.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
Patients over 60 seeing a participating General Practitioner
Currently smokes 10 or more pack years, meeting at least one of the following criteria:
Do not qualify for an urgent referral for a chest x-ray under the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines (i.e., hemoptysis or unexplained or persistent [lasting > 3 weeks] signs or symptoms), including having any of the following:
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal