ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Stepwise Strategy to Improve CANcer Screening Adherence: Cervical Cancer (SCAN-CC)

J

João Firmino Domingues Barbosa Machado

Status

Completed

Conditions

Early Detection of Cancer
Text Message
Reminder Systems
Uterine Cervical Neoplasm
Mass Screening

Treatments

Other: Customized automatic phone call invitation (Step 1b)
Other: Health professional face-to-face appointment (Step 3)
Other: Written Letter
Other: Customized text message invitation ( Step 1a)
Other: Secretary phone call (Step 2)

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT03122275
EPIUnit_SCANCC_2017

Details and patient eligibility

About

This study aims to assess the effectiveness of a stepwise approach, with increasing complexity and cost, to improve adherence to organized cervical cancer screening: step 1a - customized text message invitation; step 1b - customized automatic phone call invitation; step 2 - secretary phone call; step 3 - health professionals face-to-face appointment.

A population-based randomized controlled trial will be implemented in Portuguese urban and rural areas. Women eligible for cervical cancer screening will be randomized (1:1) to intervention and control. In the intervention group, women will be invited for screening through text messages, automatic phone calls, manual phone calls and health professional appointments, to be applied sequentially to participants remaining non-adherent after each step. Control will be the standard of care (invitation by written letter).

As primary objectives, we intend to test the superiority of interventions based on step 1 (1a+1b) and multistage interventions based on steps 1 and 2 and steps 1 to 3, based on intention-to-treat analyses.

Full description

The secondary objectives will be the following:

  1. To test the non-inferiority of interventions based on step 1a and step 1 (1a+1b), considering a non-inferiority limit of 5%;

  2. To test the superiority of the specific components of the multistage intervention corresponding to step 2 and step 3;

  3. To quantify the differences in adherence to cervical cancer screening, for interventions based on step 1 (1a+1b) and multistage interventions based on steps 1 and 2 and steps 1 to 3, between:

    1. Urban and rural areas;
    2. Younger and older population;
    3. Deprived and wealthy population;
    4. Never vs. ever users of screening;
    5. History of regular vs. irregular participation in screening programs.
  4. To quantify the differences in adherence to cervical cancer screening when using a positive or a neutral content of text messages and automatic phone calls, in step 1;

  5. To estimate the proportion of women who were performing cervical cancer screening in private health care services who started to be screened in an organized cervical cancer screening program, after a nurse face-to-face appointment at their primary care unit.

Intention-to-treat analysis will be used as primary strategy for all comparisons between interventions and control. Secondary per-protocol analysis will also be conducted. Binary logistic regression may be used to control for confounding, or in secondary analyses of the isolate effects of steps 1a, 2 and 3.

Enrollment

1,220 patients

Sex

Female

Ages

25 to 49 years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Women aged between 25 and 49 years

  • Medical registration at any of the primary health care units selected for this study

  • Eligible for cervical cancer screening*

    • *Defined as all women aged between 25 and 60 years old who do not verify any of the following criteria: hysterectomized, active cervical cancer disease, currently undergoing cervical cancer treatment or did not start sexual activity.

Exclusion criteria

  • Unavailability of mobile phone number

Trial design

Primary purpose

Screening

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

1,220 participants in 2 patient groups

Stepwise intervention
Experimental group
Description:
Stepwise approach, with increasing complexity and cost, to improve adherence to organized cervical cancer screening, implemented through three steps: step 1a - customized text message invitation; step 1b - customized automatic phone call invitation; step 2 - secretary phone call; step 3 - health professional phone call and face-to-face appointment. Intervention stops whenever the participant adheres to organized screening or after undergoing the complete stepwise intervention.
Treatment:
Other: Secretary phone call (Step 2)
Other: Customized automatic phone call invitation (Step 1b)
Other: Health professional face-to-face appointment (Step 3)
Other: Customized text message invitation ( Step 1a)
Written Letter
Active Comparator group
Description:
Comparator will be the standard of care of invitation to cervical cancer screening: written letter
Treatment:
Other: Written Letter

Trial contacts and locations

2

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems