STOP-UC: De-escalation of Therapy in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis With Histological Remission

The University of Chicago

Status: Enrolling

Conditions: Ulcerative Colitis (UC)

Treatments: Other: continuation of current therapy; Other: de-escalation or discontinuation of therapy

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT06693310

IRB24-0008

Details and patient eligibility

About

The goal of this study is to better understand treatment strategies for people with ulcerative colitis (UC). Researchers will compare patients with UC in histologic remission (no evidence of inflammation or active disease on endoscopy and biopsies) who continue to take medical therapy to patients with UC who de-escalate (decrease or discontinue) medical therapy. Both treatment strategies are considered within regular medical practice. Researchers want to find out whether remission can be maintained after de-escalation of therapy.

Participants will be:

• either be randomly assigned to continue medical therapy or de-escalate medical therapy -OR- be assigned per the participant's preference
• clinically managed according to regular medical care
• asked to provide blood, stool (poop), and tissue samples for study purposes

Full description

This is a prospective, partially-randomized, patient-preference clinical trial conducted at a tertiary academic center [University of Chicago Medicine Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) Center]. Patients in clinical, biochemical, and endoscopic remission with biopsies showing histologic quiescence or normalization will be identified and approached after consultation with their IBD care team.

Subjects will be given a choice to either de-escalate their therapy (de-escalation group) or continue their current therapy (control group). This study design is to enhance the feasibility and real-world applicability. By permitting participants with strong preferences to choose their assigned strategy, we anticipate higher enrollment and retention among eligible subjects who might otherwise decline participation. Participants without a clear preference will be randomized 1:1 to de-escalation versus continuation, thereby preserving the integrity of comparative analyses. This approach enhances generalizability, respects patient autonomy, and mirrors clinical decision-making in routine clinical practice while maintaining methodological rigor.

After enrollment, participants will be monitored for 24 months. After the 24-month period, participants who remain in remission will continue 5 years of longitudinal data collection from routine clinical care.

Enrollment: 200 estimated patients

Sex: All

Ages: 18 to 75 years old

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

1. Consenting patients aged 18 to 75 years with an established diagnosis of ulcerative colitis (UC) for at least 3 years.

2. Patients in deep remission, defined by the absence of endoscopic and histologic signs of active inflammation (i.e. histological normalization or histological quiescence) in all biopsies obtained during colonoscopy, within the last 12 months.

   • If the most recent colonoscopy is within the last 3 years and demonstrates normalized/quiescent pathology findings (i.e., patient is in stable remission), the patient would not be expected to undergo yearly colonoscopies. Therefore, a persistent normalized calprotectin test will be accepted as sufficient to define deep remission with no change in therapy.

3. Patients in clinical, biochemical (fecal calprotectin <100), radiologic and endoscopic remission since the last colonoscopy.

Exclusion criteria

1. Any noted active inflammation [clinical, sonographic, biochemical, endoscopic (in any colonic segment)].
2. Patients with any changes in therapy after colonoscopy showing histological normalization or quiescence.
3. Corticosteroid use after colonoscopy showing histologic normalization or quiescence.
4. Patients with any noted history of primary sclerosing cholangitis or invisible or unresected high-grade dysplasia (suspected or confirmed).
5. Pregnancy or actively trying to conceive
6. Inability to follow the proposed sample collection and monitoring protocol.

Trial design

Primary purpose: Other

Allocation: Non-Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: None (Open label)

---

200 participants in 2 patient groups

Control group

Active Comparator group

Description:

continuation of current therapy

Treatment:

Other: continuation of current therapy

de-escalation group

Active Comparator group

Description:

de-escalation or discontinuation of therapy

Treatment:

Other: de-escalation or discontinuation of therapy