ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Strain Counterstrain Technique and Graston Technqiue on Quadratus Lumborum Trigger Points

R

Riphah International University

Status

Begins enrollment this month

Conditions

Trigger Point Pain, Myofascial

Treatments

Other: Graston technique
Other: Strain counterstrain technique

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT06986707
REC/RCR&AHS/24/0157

Details and patient eligibility

About

Poor body mechanics and posture affects body positioning and stresses quadratus lumborum muscle which ultimately leads to myofascial trigger points in muscle. This study aims to compare the effects of Strain counterstrain technique and Graston technique on trigger points of quadratus lumborum in nonspecific low back patients. This study will be a randomized controlled trial and will be conducted in Riphah Rehabilitation Clinic Lahore and SPARC Physiotherapy Clinic Lahore. Non-probability convenient sampling will be used to collect the data. Sample size of 34 subjects with age group between 20-45 years will be taken. baseline and after 4 weeks. Data analysis will be done by SPSS version 25.

Full description

Researches have been conducted about effect of instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization versus kinesiotape for chronic mechanical low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Introduction. The objective was to compare the effect of conventional program, instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM) and kinesiotape (KT) in patients with chronic mechanical low back pain (CMLBP). 51 participants were randomly enrolled into three equal groups. Group A (n = 17) received conventional program, Group B (n = 17) received conventional program plus IASTM, and Group C (n = 17) received conventional program plus KT. The participants were evaluated before and after eight sessions using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), pressure algometer, dual inclinometer, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). It was concluded that Conventional program, IASTM and KT are effective methods for improving pain, ROM and function on CMLBP..Low back pain especially which is not related to any specific disease has become very common nowadays. Almost every other person complains about back pain. While there have been numerous studies on low back pain and its treatments but limited work has done on both techniques, the strain counterstrain technique and Graston technique. This study aims to determine the comparison of strain counterstrain technique and Graston technique on trigger points of quadratus lumborum among patients with non-specific low back pain

Enrollment

34 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

20 to 45 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Participant's age range 20-45 years
  • Both genders.
  • Individuals having low back pain for atleast 12 weeks with limited segmental mobility especially after maintaining certain prolonged posture .
  • Individuals with localized pain and tenderness at attachments of quadratus lumborum due to the presence of trigger points (unilateral or bilateral).
  • positive segmental mobility assessment at the level of L4 and L5 on one side or on both sides
  • Patients having moderate pain on NPRS

Exclusion criteria

  • Individuals with anticoagulation or bleeding disorders, acute muscle trauma, infections, lumbar disc herniation, spinal deformities, or a history of spinal surgery or anticoagulation medication
  • Orthopedic surgery or any other low back surgery .
  • Fracture of vertebrae and any lower limb injury

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Double Blind

34 participants in 2 patient groups

strain counterstrain technique
Experimental group
Description:
Strain Counter-Strain Technique: (repeated 2 sets in each session) * 1 day per week * 4 weeks protocol
Treatment:
Other: Strain counterstrain technique
Graston technique
Active Comparator group
Description:
Before starting procedure, brisk walking or stretching is done for 4- 5 minutes * Applying heat for 3-4 minutes to warm the area * 40 seconds on right side * 40 seconds on left side
Treatment:
Other: Graston technique

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

Imran Amjad, phD

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2025 Veeva Systems