ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Stratafix Vs. Vicryl OAGB / MGB Suture Study

S

St. Franziskus Hospital

Status

Completed

Conditions

Anastomotic Stenosis
Morbid Obesity
Hemorrhage Postoperative
Anastomotic Leak

Treatments

Device: Vicryl
Device: Stratafix

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT04613635
20191020

Details and patient eligibility

About

To compare shorttime (6 months) results of two competitive suture materials with regard to time demanded to perform the concerned surgical step and secondary to study anastomotic site safety and complications like leakage and hemorrhage as well as development of anastomotic strictures. Evaluation of cost-effectiveness.

Enrollment

100 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • adult patients selected for primary Mini-Gastric bypass to treat obesity (BMI>30)
  • laparoscopic access feasable (intention to treat laparoscopically)
  • failed conservative treatment (accepted by health insurance companies)
  • relevant co-morbidities in cases with BMI <40
  • age 18 years or elder

Exclusion criteria

  • severe language problems
  • revisional or redo-procedures
  • operation intended as open procedure(extensive previous surgeries),
  • operation performed under corticoid-medication
  • operation performed under full-dose anticoagulants
  • operation performed by another surgeon than one of the 3 experienced MGB-surgeons of the Department

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

100 participants in 2 patient groups

Stratafix
Experimental group
Treatment:
Device: Stratafix
Vicryl
Active Comparator group
Treatment:
Device: Vicryl

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

Karl P Rheinwalt, MD; Andreas Plamper, MD

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems