ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Strength and Aerobic Training Against Hot Flushes in Postmenopausal Women (START)

L

Linköping University (LiU)

Status

Enrolling

Conditions

Hot Flashes
Postmenopausal Symptoms

Treatments

Other: Strength training
Other: High-intensity aerobic training

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT06030388
START2022-05030-1

Details and patient eligibility

About

The goal of this randomised controlled trial is to investigate the effects of and compare two modes of physical exercise (strength training and high-intensity aerobic exercise) to unchanged physical activity on vasomotor symptoms (hot flushes) in postmenopausal women. The main question it aims to answer is the effect of 15 weeks of strength training vs high intensity aerobic training vs unchanged physical activity on frequency and severity of hot flushes. Participants will be randomised to:

  1. strength training
  2. high-intensity aerobic training
  3. untreated control group.

Researchers will compare strength training, high-intensity aerobic training and untreated control group to see if training can reduce hot flushes.

Full description

The overall aim is to investigate the efficacy of and compare two modes of physical exercise (strength training and high-intensity aerobic exercise) to unchanged physical activity on vasomotor symptoms (VMS), as well as secondary outcomes such as health-related quality of life, sleep quality, physical activity levels, clinical outcomes, biomarkers, bone markers (outcome added January 2025), bone mineral density (outcome added January 2025), perceptions of and adherence to the interventions. In a longer perspective, the goal is to find evidence-based treatment options for VMS in postmenopausal women that are safe and effective, and have positive effects on health and quality of life after menopause.

Our hypothesis is that strength training and high-intensity aerobic exercise will reduce VMS in postmenopausal women and improve quality of life as well as clinical outcomes more than in a control group with unchanged physical activity. We also hypothesize that strength training and high-intensity aerobic training will have the same effect on the primary outcome (change in VMS) and that most of the changes in secondary outcomes will be superior in the high-intensity aerobic training group compared to the strength training group.

This is an open, two-centre, parallel, randomized controlled study performed according to the SPIRIT and CONSORT statements

Recruitment will take place by advertising on social media, in local newspapers and in the Women's clinics and primary care centers in Linköping and Kalmar. Women who respond to the advertisements will be contacted by a member of the research group or research nurse to receive information about the study and screen for inclusion and exclusion criteria. Women who are possibly eligible will be invited to a screening visit for further information and informed consent. At the visit, inclusion and exclusion criteria will be checked by a physician, and a clinical examination will be performed. Eligible participants will receive a VMS screening diary and invited to a second visit 2-3 weeks later where inclusion and randomization will be performed if the VMS inclusion criteria are fulfilled.

Randomization An allocation sequence using a computerized random number generator will be prepared by a statistician not involved in recruitment. Opaque sealed and sequentially numbered envelopes with group allocation will be prepared and opened in the presence of the participant upon inclusion and randomization.

Power analysis: A sample size calculation was made based on the results of our previous study on strength training for VMS (Berin et al 2019) and showed that to detect a 50% difference in moderate and severe hot flushes with 80% power and expected dropout rate of 20% 40 participants in total would be needed. For this three-armed set-up we estimate that 20 participants in each group will be needed, i.e. 60 in total. To also achieve sufficient power for some of the secondary outcomes the intended sample size is increased to 30 per group, 90 in total.

Data analysis: The primary analysis will be performed according to the intention-to-treat principle, including all participants who provided more than baseline data for the primary outcome. For quantitative interval data mixed design ANOVAs will be used to analyze the effect over time between and within groups. For the between-group comparisons effect sizes will be calculated. For ordinal data, such as the questionnaires, Kruskal-Wallis and Friedman test will be used for statistical analysis of the effect. Participants who complete two or more training sessions per week will be considered adherent with their assigned intervention and included in a per-protocol analysis. Detailed description of adherence, such as the fidelity with the training interventions, will be presented descriptively.

Enrollment

90 estimated patients

Sex

Female

Ages

45+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Postmenopausal women (one of: ≥ 12 months since last menstruation; amenorrhea due to intrauterine device or hysterectomy and Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) >30 mIU/ml; bilateral oophorectomy; induced menopause due to chemotherapy or radiation and ≥2 years amenorrhea);
  • ≥ 28 moderate to severe hot flushes per week during a 2-week screening period, registered through a daily VMS diary;
  • Age ≥45 years;
  • Physical ability to participate in strength training or high intensity aerobic exercise for 60 minutes, 3 times/week during 15 weeks;
  • Understand Swedish orally and in writing

Exclusion criteria

  • Regular physical activity >30 minutes per week of vigorous intensity or ≥150 minutes of moderate intensity or combined activities representing maximum 150 minutes of moderate intensity;
  • Use of systemic menopausal hormone therapy the last 2 months;
  • Use of natural preparations such as herbal preparations for VMS, or other medications for VMS the last 2 months;
  • Capillary hemoglobin <110 g/l;
  • Blood pressure >160 mmHg systolic or >100 mmHg diastolic;
  • Unstable medical condition with a potential to affect VMS (like unregulated thyroid disease);
  • Medical condition that by a physician is judged not appropriate (because of potential to affect VMS or risk of injury with vigorous exercise)

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

90 participants in 3 patient groups

Strength training
Active Comparator group
Description:
Standardised programme with the following exercises: chest press, leg press, row, leg curl, latissimus dorsi pull down and leg extension in seated resistance machines. Training will be preceded by 7-10 minutes of warm-up and followed by two body-weight exercises for the abdominal and back muscles for two sets as many repetitions as possible, and thereafter cool down and stretches. The set-up of each machine will be recorded in the training diary. Weeks 1-3 will include two sets of training with 15-20 repetition-maximum (RM) and weeks 4-15 two sets with 8-12 RM. Throughout the intervention, loads will be adjusted to achieve muscle fatigue and approach training to failure during each set with the intent to maximize beta-endorphin release.
Treatment:
Other: Strength training
High-intensity aerobic training
Active Comparator group
Description:
Participants will be recommended to attend spinning classes three times per week. During their first visit to the training venue, they will meet a sports physiotherapist or personal trainer to be introduced to the spinning bike intervention. The intended intensity is ≥ 14 on the Borg rating of perceived exertion scale, equivalent to high intensity training (\>70% of VO2max) with the aim of attaining sufficient stimulus for beta-endorphin release. During weeks 1-3 participants will attend spinning classes for beginners with lower intensity and predominantly seated cycling. They will progress to higher intensity classes with greater variation between seated and standing cycling during week 4-15.
Treatment:
Other: High-intensity aerobic training
Control group
No Intervention group
Description:
The control group will be recommended to carry on physical activity as usual and not to change their training or dietary habits during the 15-week study period. The control group will be contacted every fourth weeks by a research nurse to follow up on their general well-being and any questions they might have about menopause. After the study period they will be offered individual advise about training from a physiotherapist or personal trainer.

Trial contacts and locations

2

Loading...

Central trial contact

Anna-Clara Spetz Holm, Ass prof, MD

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2025 Veeva Systems