Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
The overall question the investigators would like to help answer is whether SE with or without MCE data can be widely used as a first line investigation in women with no previous history of Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) who present with chest pain of recent onset. In order to answer this question the investigators will look at the following:
i) Is SE superior to ExECG in terms of cost to diagnosis and negative predictive value of CAD?
ii) What is the additive value of myocardial perfusion data to wall motion data for predicting significant CAD on angiography and future cardiac events in women?
iii) What is the additive value of Carotid ultrasonography in a large population of women referred for stress testing?
Full description
The investigators plan to perform a prospective study on all women seen in our RACPC with no previous history of CAD and intermediate pre-test probability of CAD as determined by National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines, who require a functional test as part of their assessment. All patients that meet the inclusion criteria and do not meet any of the exclusion criteria will be approached for consent to the study.
Patients who can perform greater than 5 metabolic equivalents (METS) on the Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) questionaire will be randomised between undergoing an Exercise ECG (Ex-ECG) or Exercise Stress Echo (ESE). The DASI is a 12-item questionnaire that estimates self-reported physical work capacity and is converted to an estimate of peak metabolic equivalents. Patients who do not meet this criteria, will undergo a pharmacological stress echocardiogram using Dobutamine (DSE), including Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography (MCE). Investigations will continue to be performed as per standard clinical departmental protocols as described below. In addition, all patients will undergo carotid ultrasonography. The techniques used are described for completeness as they are all well-established in clinical practice.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
416 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal