Study Comparing Magnetic Seizure Therapy (MST) to Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) for Depression in Older Adults (MSTvsEST)

New York State Psychiatric Institute

Status and phase: Completed; Phase 2; Phase 1

Conditions: Major Depressive Episode; Bipolar Disorder; Depression

Treatments: Biological: RUL ECT; Device: MagVenture MagPro MST

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT01869374

6427

Details and patient eligibility

About

To evaluate the feasibility, tolerability and efficacy of Magnetic Seizure Therapy (MST) in elderly patients with a major depressive episode, who are randomly assigned to receive an acute course of MST or ECT.

The investigators hypothesize:

1. MST and ECT will have similar antidepressant efficacy
2. MST will have less post-treatment amnesia than ECT as reflected in a primary measures of anterograde and retrograde amnesia following the acute treatment phase.
3. At follow up, MST will show a lesser degree of persisting deficit in measures of retrograde amnesia than ECT.

Full description

The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical efficacy and side effects of Magnetic Seizure Therapy (MST) and Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) in older adults currently experiencing a major depressive episode in the context of either unipolar or bipolar depression. ECT is known to be highly effective in treating depression, but it can have some adverse cognitive side effects. MST is a new form of convulsive therapy that is being developed as a means of improving the side effect profile of ECT so that more patients may benefit without suffering significant detrimental effects on cognition.

Both ECT and MST rely on a therapeutic seizure, but they do so in different ways. In ECT, an electrical stimulator is used to pass electrical current between two electrodes placed on the surface of person's head, which causes some electricity to go through the brain and cause a seizure. In MST, a magnetic stimulator is used to create a magnetic field in a targeted area of the brain, which induces a small electrical field in the neurons that causes a seizure. Treatments will be administered three times a week.

In addition to the treatment sessions, this study will involve a number of assessments at different time-points (i.e., baseline prior to treatment, post-treatment, 2 months post-treatment and 6 months post-treatment) that are used to evaluate the person's antidepressant response and the physical and cognitive side effects of treatment.

Enrollment: 18 patients

Sex: All

Ages: 55 to 90 years old

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• Age 55-90
• Clinical diagnosis of major depressive episode, in the context of unipolar or bipolar disorder
• Willing and capable to provide informed consent
• Convulsive therapy clinically indicated
• Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD24)≥ 20
• Mini Mental State Exam (MMSE) ≥ 24
• For outpatients: responsible adult living with the patient

Exclusion criteria

• Current unstable or serious medical condition, or any comorbid medical condition that substantially increases the risks of ECT (such as acute myocardial infarction, space occupying brain lesion or other cause of increased intracranial pressure, unstable aneurysm or vascular malformation, poorly controlled diabetes mellitus, carcinoma, renal failure, hepatic failure)
• History of neurological disorder, epilepsy, stroke, brain surgery, metal in the head, history of known structural brain lesion
• Presence of devices that may be affected by MST (pacemaker, medication pump, cochlear implant, implanted brain stimulator, or vagus nerve stimulator implanted)
• History of head trauma with loss of consciousness for greater than 5 minutes
• History of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or rapid cycling bipolar disorder
• History of substance abuse or dependence in past 3 months
• Failure to respond to an adequate course of ECT in the current depressive episode
• History of ECT in the past 6 months and/or failure to respond to an adequate trial of ECT lifetime
• Presence of intracardiac lines

Trial design

Primary purpose: Treatment

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: Triple Blind

---

18 participants in 2 patient groups

Magnetic Seizure Therapy (MST)

Experimental group

Description:

MagVenture MagPro MST device

Treatment:

Device: MagVenture MagPro MST

RUL ECT

Active Comparator group

Description:

Right Unilateral ECT with the Somatics Thymatron device using Ultrabrief stimulus

Treatment:

Biological: RUL ECT