ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Study Comparing Pursestring Wound Closure vs Conventional Closure to Reverse Stoma of Colorectal Cancer Patients (PURSE)

Zhejiang University logo

Zhejiang University

Status

Conditions

Stoma Closure Technic
Colorectal Cancer

Treatments

Device: prolene
Procedure: Conventional Wound Closure
Procedure: Pursestring Wound Closure

Study type

Expanded Access

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT02564224
CRCCZ-S01

Details and patient eligibility

About

Temporary stomas has been performed to reduce complications after colorectal cancer surgery, especially in high-risk anastomosis. Different closure technics showed different outcome. The aim of this study is to compare the scar length , surgical site infection and pain score of purse-string wound closure vs conventional closure.

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 80 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Receiving temporary ostomy because of colorectal cancer at least 3 months ago;
  • Age of≥18 and ≤80

Exclusion criteria

  • Not willing or incapable to comply with all study visits and assessments
  • Evidence of any other disease, metabolic dysfunction, physical examination finding or laboratory finding giving reasonable suspicion of a disease or condition that puts the patient at high risk for treatment-related complications

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems