Status and phase
Conditions
Treatments
About
two-armed trial to compare E-nP-C against tailored dtEC-dtD in patients with high risk early breast cancer
Full description
The Norton-Simon-Hypothesis on log cell kill suggests that chemotherapy should be given at maximum dosages at minimum intervals. Combination chemotherapy, which always has to make compromises regarding the doses of each drug and treatment intervals due to acute as well as cumulative toxicities, does therefore not comply with this theory. Sequential application of monotherapies, however, allows very high single agent doses and dose-dense treatment intervals. Regimens designed according to the Norton-Simon-Hypothesis have shown to be highly active as adjuvant treatment for early breast cancer. As the number of cycles of each agent can be restricted to 3, as previously done in the AGO ETC trial by Möbus et al., cumulative toxicities do not really occur.
Two large scale trials of dose-dense chemotherapy have proven very high protective activity against tumor recurrence (AGO ETC (Ref.1) and CALGB 9741 (Ref.2)). Especially the ETC trial (epirubicin, solvent-based paclitaxel, and cyclophosphamide) showed an impressive superior DFS and OS in 1284 high-risk breast cancer patients with > 4positive lymph nodes. The doses used are exceptional at maximum dosage and minimum intervals with epirubicin 150 mg/m², Paclitaxel 225 mg/m² and cyclophosphamide 2.5 g/m² given every 2 weeks based on the above described Norton-Simon-Hypothesis. However, as each drug was given only 3 times at intervals of 2 weeks, this regimen is feasible and safe with primary support of G-CSF and ESF. The ETC schedule is today considered standard of care for high-risk breast cancer patients in Germany.
However, both trials, ETC and CALGB 9741, compared the dose-dense concept against EC-P q3w which is nowadays considered to be an inferior regimen compared to EC-P weekly or EC-Doc. The GAIN trial had a 2x2 factorial design and explored ETC versus EC-TX and ibandronate vs. observation. The trial closed recruitment after 3023 pts in July 2008. In the Panther trial, a joint effort of SBG, ABCSG, AGO-B and GBG, the tailored, dose-dense EC-Doc (dtEC-dtD) regimen was tested against conventional dosed FEC-Doc. Efficacy results are to be awaited, safety results will be published in 2012.
Nab-paclitaxel (nP) provides a better toxicity profile and a higher efficacy compared to solvent based taxanes (paclitaxel and docetaxel). It might therefore be the preferred component in an intense dose-dense regimen. Assuming that the corresponding dose of nab-paclitaxel to 175 mg/m² paclitaxel is 260 mg/m², an appropriate dose would be 330 mg/m² nab-paclitaxel to substitute paclitaxel at 225 mg/m². So far, no experience with such a dose of nab-paclitaxel is available. However, initial experience with 300mg/m² q3w and 150mg/m² weekly (in 3 out of 4 weeks) showed a good safety profile even when given for a median of 8 cycles (Ref.3). Another pilot study showed a good tolerability of 260 mg/m² nab-paclitaxel given q2w for 4 cycles (Ref.4+5).
The GAIN-2 trial will allow for comparing the toxicity and effectiveness of a predefined intense dose-dense regimen (EnPC) vs. a dose-dense regimen with modification of single doses depending on individual haematological and non-haematological toxicities. The primary aim of the GAIN-2 trial will be to compare the invasive disease-free survival after adjuvant chemotherapy with EnPC or dtEC-dtD in patients with primary node-positive or high risk node negative breast cancer. To explore the maximum dose of nab-paclitaxel in this setting, a run-in phase with varying doses of nab-paclitaxel is included in the study design.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Written informed consent for all study procedures according to local regulatory requirements prior to beginning specific protocol procedures.
Histologically confirmed unilateral or bilateral primary carcinoma of the breast.
Age at diagnosis at least 18 years, female, and biologically not older than 65 years (but in any case not older than 70 years).
In case of adjuvant therapy: Adequate surgical treatment with histological complete resection (R0) of the invasive breast tumor. Choice of axilla surgery is up to the participating site.
Centrally confirmed ER/PgR/HER2 and Ki-67 status detected on surgical removed tissue (for adjuvant patients) or from core biopsy (for neoadjuvant patients). ER/PR positive is defined as ≥ 1% stained cells and HER2 positive is defined as IHC 3+ in > 10% immunoreactive cells or FISH (or equivalent test) ratio ≥ 2.0. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) breast tissue has to be sent to the Institute of Pathology at the Charité Berlin prior to randomization.
High risk breast cancer as defined as:
Complete staging work-up within 3 months prior to randomization. All patients must have performed bilateral mammography, breast ultrasound, breast MRT (optional), chest X-ray (PA and lateral), abdominal ultrasound or CT scan or MRT and bone scan. In case of positive bone scan, bone X-ray (or CT or MRT) is mandatory. Other tests may be performed as clinically indicated.
Karnofsky Performance status index ≥ 80%.
Estimated life expectancy of at least 10 years irrespective of the diagnosis of breast cancer.
Confirmed normal cardiac function by ECG and cardiac ultrasound (LVEF or shortening fraction) within 2 weeks prior to randomization. LVEF must be above 55%.
Laboratory requirements:
Hematology
Negative pregnancy test (urine or serum) within 14 days prior to randomization for all women of childbearing potential.
Complete baseline documentation must be submitted via MedCODES and approved by GBG Forschungs GmbH.
Patients must be available and compliant for central diagnostics, treatment and follow-up.
Exclusion criteria
Patients with Luminal A-like tumors (ER and or PgR positive, HER2 negative and Ki-67 ≤ 20%) and
Non-operable breast cancer.
In case of adjuvant therapy: time since axillary dissection or SLNB > 3 months (optimal < 1 month).
Previous and already (neoadjuvant or adjuvant) treated invasive breast carcinoma.
Previous malignant disease being disease-free for less than 5 years (except CIS of the cervix and non-melanomatous skin cancer).
Known or suspected congestive heart failure (> NYHA I) and/or coronary heart disease, angina pectoris requiring anti-anginal medication, previous history of myocardial infarction, evidence of transmural infarction on ECG, uncontrolled or poorly controlled arterial hypertension (i.e. BP > 160/90mm Hg under treatment with two antihypertensive drugs), rhythm abnormalities requiring permanent treatment, clinically significant valvular heart disease.
Evidence for infection including wound infections, HIV, hepatitis.
History of significant neurological or psychiatric disorders including psychotic disorders, dementia or seizures that would prohibit the understanding and giving of informed consent.
Pre-existing motor or sensory neuropathy of a severity ≥ grade 1 by NCI-CTCAE version 4.0.
Other severe and relevant co-morbidity that would interact with the application of cytotoxic agents or the participation in the study.
Previous or concurrent treatment with:
Absolute contraindications for the use of corticosteroids.
Pregnant or lactating patients. Patients of childbearing potential must implement adequate non-hormonal contraceptive measures (barrier methods, intrauterine contraceptive devices, sterilization) during study treatment.
Known hypersensitivity reaction to one of the compounds or incorporated substances used in this protocol.
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
2,886 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal