ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Study of Respiratory Physiology During High Flow Nasal Cannula Treatment in Preterm Neonates.

N

Newcastle-upon-Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Extreme Prematurity - Less Than 28 Weeks
Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Premature Infants

Treatments

Other: Transcutaneous carbon dioxide
Other: Tidal volume
Other: Pharyngeal gas concentrations
Other: Pharyngeal pressure

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

Details and patient eligibility

About

The most commonly used noninvasive respiratory support in preterm babies is Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP), which provides extra breathing support to babies who are breathing by themselves). Increasingly High flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC, newer form of extra breathing support) therapy has found its way in clinical practice despite lack of good physiological data. There are also concerns about its potential to generate higher pressures in airways which can cause over distension of lungs.

We would like to find out the effects of HFNC on

    1. Airway pressures in various flow rates and in comparison to CPAP.
    1. Breathing markers including respiratory rate (speed of breathing), oxygen and carbon dioxide levels, tidal volumes (how much air breathed in with each breath) and airway wash out (wash out of waste gas from the airway).

We plan to study 15 babies each in three different weight categories supported with either CPAP or HFNC. The airway pressures, oxygen and carbon dioxide concentration in airway are measured by a small plastic catheter (similar to feeding tube but much shorter in length), carbon dioxide levels by skin sensors, how fast and how much babies breathe by a special vest applied like a layer of clothing. These will be recorded both on HFNC and CPAP. There are no blood tests or invasive procedures involved. The baby will be monitored throughout the study period of approximately two hours by experienced registrar who is trained to use the study device.

This study will improve our understanding of physiological effects of HFNC and lead to better care of preterm babies.

Full description

Purpose and design

Design: Prospective randomised crossover study.

Purpose:

  • Raising airway pressure is one of the most important interventions at the disposal of clinicians treating patients with respiratory failure. In premature infants Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) and High Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) are noninvasive techniques to raise mean airway pressure when intubation is not required. It is not clear how clinicians choose between these techniques and there is little data comparing the physiological effect of these treatments.
  • A composite physiological assessment of babies on HFNC and CPAP treatment is required to understand how HFNC works. It is important to answer this question to understand how best to use HFNC in babies.
  • This proposal is designed to provide information on physiological effects of both therapies in same population of babies across different weight categories. The study protocol involves use of same HFNC device that is currently being used in neonatal unit.

Interventions:

  1. A small plastic catheter tip transducer (Gaeltec) will be placed in upper breathing passage (nasopharynx or oropharynx) using standard methods. From this we will measure airway pressures and respiratory gas concentrations.

The catheter will be removed soon after the study is completed. This procedure will be done once during the study.

  1. Breathing markers (Tidal breathing indices) will be measured by non invasive method using Volusense method where a vest will be applied over the chest and abdomen like a layer of clothing. The Volusense vest will be removed soon after the procedure. This process is done once during the study.

  2. Blood carbon dioxide (CO2) levels will be measured by a non invasive transcutaneous sensor applied to the skin (Tosca Radiometer). This skin sensor will be removed soon after the study is completed.

  3. The baby must be clinically stable for preceding 12 hours on noninvasive breathing support (not meeting exit criteria). The babies will be randomised to either group 1 (CPAP first followed by HFNC) or group 2 (HFNC first followed by CPAP) by computerised software programme.

  4. The measuring devices namely nasopharyngeal catheter, Volusense vest and transcutaneous CO2 sensor are placed as per standard methods.

  5. After ensuring babies' clinical stability the measurements are recorded at HFNC gas flow rate range from 2 litres to 8 litres per minute and in CPAP of 6 cm of water pressure level.

  6. The study lasts about 2 hours. The baby spends 10 minutes at each HFNC flow rate level and 30 minutes of equilibration period when support will be changed between HFNC and CPAP.

  7. Routine measurement of heart rate, respiratory rate and oxygen saturations will be done as per standard neonatal practice. The above data will be recorded electronically for analysis with total study duration around 120 minutes.

  8. Respiratory support can be terminated at any point if clinically not indicated.

The researcher is an experienced neonatal registrar who will be directly observing the baby throughout the study.

Measurements would be discontinued if any pre set exit criteria is noted.

Statistics: A total of 45 babies (15 babies in each weight category: <1000 grams, 1001500 grams and >1500 grams) will be studied.

Enrollment

45 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

5 days to 4 months old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • They are less than 37 weeks' gestation at birth and more than 5 days of age
  • Are on non-invasive respiratory support and
  • The parent(s) have given written informed consent to their baby's participation

Exclusion criteria

  • Infants who are clinically unstable and unsuitable for non-invasive respiratory support as judged by attending neonatology consultant clinician.
  • Participation in a concurrent study that prohibits inclusion in other trials
  • Known major upper airway, lower respiratory tract, cardiac or gastrointestinal tract anomaly
  • Current complications such as pneumothorax.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Basic Science

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Crossover Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

45 participants in 2 patient groups

Group 1 ( CPAP followed by HFNC)
Active Comparator group
Description:
In this group pharyngeal pressure, transcutaneous carbon dioxide concentration, tidal volumes and pharyngeal gas concentrations will be recorded on CPAP first followed by HFNC.
Treatment:
Other: Transcutaneous carbon dioxide
Other: Tidal volume
Other: Pharyngeal gas concentrations
Other: Pharyngeal pressure
Group 2 (HFNC followed by CPAP)
Active Comparator group
Description:
In this group pharyngeal pressure, transcutaneous carbon dioxide concentration, tidal volumes and pharyngeal gas concentrations will be recorded on HFNC first followed by CPAP.
Treatment:
Other: Transcutaneous carbon dioxide
Other: Tidal volume
Other: Pharyngeal gas concentrations
Other: Pharyngeal pressure

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

Christopher O'Brien, MRCP, FRCPCH; Saikiran Gopalakaje, MD, MRCPCH

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems