Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
The purpose of this research study is to see how effective hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) is compared to best available non-transplant therapies (BAT) in patients with high risk myelofibrosis. This will be done by asking participants to choose the treatment that they prefer to receive (HCT or BAT) and then comparing the outcomes of the participants in both treatment groups.
Full description
There is currently little information regarding which treatments are best for patients with myelofibrosis. On one hand, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) is potentially curative treatment but is associated with significant risk of complications related to graft failure (the new donor cells does not grow properly after the transplant), side effects such as graft versus host disease (the patient's cells attack the new donor cells), and risk of infections. Non-transplant therapies such as ruxolitinib provide effective symptom control for few months to few years, but are not curative in nature. As such, this study will compare the effectiveness of HCT versus best available non-transplant therapies (BAT) in patients with high risk myelofibrosis.
This is an observational study, meaning that participants will be followed to assess the effects of their treatment, but no intervention (treatments) will be given as a part of this study.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Recruitment Part:
Study Arm Allocation:
Exclusion criteria
Recruitment Part:
Study Arm Allocation:
90 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Vikas Gupta, M.D.
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal