Status
Conditions
Treatments
Study type
Funder types
Identifiers
About
Amidst medical innovations, many Type 1 diabetes patients using advanced therapy show improved control but still suffer from diabetes-related distress. To tackle this, the investigators propose an "enhanced care" model involving healthcare providers and pharmacists. The study compares standard and enhanced care for Type 1 adults, focusing on the pharmacist's role.
The main question it aims to answer is : In patients with type 1 diabetes treated with pump or closed-loop therapy, does the improved enhanced care versus conventional layout improve diabetes-related distress at 12 months?
Participants will complete a monthly online questionnaire to assess their diabetes-related distress as well as their frequency of use of standard and enhanced care as well as the associated patient satisfaction.
Full description
Amidst accelerating innovations in care and limited medical time, many patients with Type 1 diabetes treated by pump or closed-loop therapy appear to have improved glycaemic control, but still experience significant diabetes-related distress.
The investigators therefore propose that a new form of patient care service provided by a health service provider and the patient's pharmacist, as part of the new type of care called "enhanced care", could contribute to overcoming this challenge.
This study compares two different care services provided to adult patients with Type 1 diabetes (PwT1D) treated with an insulin pump or a closed-loop system, known as standard care and enhanced care, the main difference between which lies in the pharmacist's involvement in the enhanced care model.
The originality of this project lies in several points:
Diabetes-related distress is a well-known complication, but means of prevention remain inadequate. This study integrates live collection of patient data, by the patient. Patient experience is an innovative approach that plays an increasingly important role in the evaluation of new management approaches.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Non-inclusion criteria:
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
340 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Naima HAMAMOUCHE, M Sc A; Antoine POUYET, MM
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal