Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
Authors hypothesize that "no-touch" saphenous vein as I graft is superior over conventional "no-touch" saphenous vein as free graft in the incidence of graft patency.
Full description
A multicenter single blind prospective randomized superiority study is conducted. Our hypothesis is that there is difference in the incidence of "no-touch" saphenous vein graft patency using it as the conventional free graft (group C) and I graft (group I) for myocardial revascularization more than 28%. If there is truly difference between groups, then total 106 patients for both groups are required to be 90% sure that the upper limit of a one-sided 95% confidence interval would reveal a difference in favour of the "no-touch" saphenous vein I graft of 28%. The blinding process is applied to a patient, who is informed about received harvesting method of saphenous vein, but don't know the type of the graft cofiguration. The study was approved by Institutional Review Board. Depending on a type of the procedure, the patients are divided into two groups: conventional free graft (group C) 53 patients and I graft (group I) 53 patients. Randomization is conducted befor operation by using accidental sampling.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
106 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Dmitry Khvan, Ph.D.
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal