Status
Conditions
About
Multi-centre, multi-national, observational, prospective registry in four central full access centres in Germany (2), France (1) and the United Kingdom (1) and up to two satellites per hub (smaller hospitals / office based cardiologists (OBC) without access to surgical and percutaneous aortic valve (AV) interventions).
The hypothesis is that the management of patients with severe AS will differ between sites with on-site access to all treatment modes and those without such facilities.
Full description
Data from existing studies indicate that the treatment pathways for patients with severe aortic stenosis with or without symptoms are insufficiently defined. This lack of definition can contribute both to delay in treatment and inappropriate treatment decisions. While this has been confirmed in hospitals with a full complement of treatment modalities for severe aortic stenosis, including surgery and percutaneous options, it is not known whether delay in treatment or appropriateness of treatment decisions are better or worse in smaller hospitals without equivalent on-site access.
The aim of this study is to delineate the case load of patients with aortic stenosis, outline the management of these patients and determine appropriateness in participating centres with and without on-site access to surgery and percutaneous treatment.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
791 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal