ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Subcision With PRP and Microneedling Versus Subcision With Saline and Micro-needling in Treatment of Posttraumatic Scars

A

Assiut University

Status

Completed

Conditions

Post-Traumatic Scar

Treatments

Other: subcision ,PRP or saline and microneedling

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT06135480
Post traumatic scars treatment

Details and patient eligibility

About

Compare different minimally invasive approaches to reach optimum improvement by comparing the efficacy and safety of both combined subcision with platelet-rich plasma and microneedling versus combined subcision with saline and microneedling in the treatment of post-traumatic scars.

Full description

The scars at the level of the skin represent a normal and inevitable process of healing traumatic or surgical lesions, but except for the appearance of the skin, they also have a profound psychological impact . Thus, people with scars try to integrate them into their sense of self to gain psychological acceptance .

Many treatment options have been developed for the management of traumatic scars .Surgical intervention is an invasive technique, surgery has a high risk of inducing new scar formation .

Non-surgical approaches for the treatment of traumatic scars include topical treatments and minimally invasive approached as subcision,microneedling and laser.

Autologous platelet-rich plasma is plasma with a higher concentration of platelets than normally found, it can enhance wound healing which has been demonstrated in controlled studies for soft and hard tissues . The application of autologous platelet-rich plasma to surgical wounds has been shown to accelerate tissue repair and reduce postoperative pain .

Subcision is a procedure in which a needle is inserted under the skin and passed in multiple directions . Although subcision is adequate as a stand-alone treatment, improved results are achieved when it is combined with other modalities.

Microneedling is a percutaneous collagen induction therapy that causes skin resurfacing. It involves using fine needles to create controlled microdermal injuries starting a complex cascade of growth factors that end in collagen remodeling .

Because of the different treatment options available for this common problem, the current work aimed to combine and compare different minimally invasive approaches to reach optimum improvement.

Enrollment

36 patients

Sex

All

Ages

12+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with posttraumatic scars
  • Age more than 12 years

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients with platelet or blood clotting disorders, and chronic liver or autoimmune diseases.
  • Patients with chronic debilitating diseases, uncontrolled systemic infection, or keloid tendency or with unrealistic expectations.
  • Pregnant females.
  • Patients who did not complete the treatment sessions or the follow-up period.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

36 participants in 2 patient groups

combined subcision with platelet-rich plasma and microneedling group
Active Comparator group
Treatment:
Other: subcision ,PRP or saline and microneedling
combined subcision with saline and microneedling group
Active Comparator group
Treatment:
Other: subcision ,PRP or saline and microneedling

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

Howida Omar Twisy

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems