Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
The present study aims to compare the radiographic success of endodontic treatment using Orstavik's criteria between two sealers: AH Plus (Dentsply DeTrey, Konstanz, Germany) and Neosealer Flo (Avalon Biomed, Bradenton, Florida, USA), as well as between two obturation techniques: continuous wave and single cone. The study includes 270 patients, with a minimum follow-up period of 6 months. Clinical and radiographic variables will be assessed, including quality of obturation, lesion healing, and restoration. The study seeks to determine if the use of bioceramic sealer is effective regardless of the obturation technique used, highlighting the importance of clinical follow-up to evaluate endodontic treatment success.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Patients aged 18 years and older. Teeth with a diagnosis of pulpal necrosis or irreversible pulpitis. Informed consent provided for data usage.
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
270 participants in 4 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Giulia Malvicini, DDS
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal