ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Superficial Dry Needling for Cervicogenic Headache

Y

Youngstown State University

Status

Not yet enrolling

Conditions

Headache

Treatments

Other: Superficial Dry Needling
Other: Non-thrust Mobilizations only

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT05444296
2022-186

Details and patient eligibility

About

It is unknown if applying superficial dry needling to the trigeminal innervation field improves pain and disability for patients with cervicogenic headaches. The aim of this study is to determine if superficial dry needling of the trigeminal innervation field improves pain, neck mobility, and disability in patients with cervicogenic headaches. It will also be examined if psychosocial factors such as stress, anxiety, depression and self efficacy influence improvements in pain, range of motion and neck disability.

Full description

Cervicogenic headache (CGH), is defined by the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD) as a "headache caused by a disorder of the cervical spine and its component bony, disc, and/or soft tissue elements, usually but not invariably accompanied by neck pain. Prevalence of CGH in the general population is between .4-20%. Although the primary source of pain is generated from the upper cervical spinal levels, there is also neuro-anatomical basis of CGH involving the trigeminal nerve.

Dry needling (DN) is a widely used intervention performed by physical therapists for a wide range of musculoskeletal and neurological conditions. Dry needling has been shown to be beneficial for CGH but DN has only been investigated using trigger point DN to cervical musculature. Superficial DN also reduces pain associated to orthopedic spinal conditions and may be associated with a lower risk of post-treatment soreness.

Non-thrust mobilizations of the cervical spine are an accepted treatment known to reduce pain and disability associated with CGH. Their use has also been recommended in clinical practice guidelines.

This study aims to look investigate whether superficial dry needling targeting the trigeminal innervation sensory field will reduce pain and impairments known to exist in patients with CGH compared to mobilizations of the cervical spine. Mobilizations of the cervical spine are another common treatment that physical therapists employ to treat cervicogenic headaches.

Enrollment

133 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged 18 or older
  • Symptoms: (1)Unilateral pain starting in the neck and radiating to the frontotemporal region or posterior fossa, (2) pain aggravated by neck movement, (3) restricted cervical range of motion, (4) non-throbbing and non-lancinatingnpain, 5) dysfunction/headache pain in at least one of the joints of the upper cervical spine(C0-C4), and (6) headache frequency of at least 1 per week over a period greater than 3 months.

Exclusion criteria

  • Headache or neck pain <2/10
  • Contraindications to the interventions
  • Whiplash associated disorder within 6 weeks
  • Pending litigation for neck pain and/or headache.
  • Unwilling to cease other care through duration of study

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

133 participants in 2 patient groups

Dry Needling
Experimental group
Description:
Experimental group
Treatment:
Other: Non-thrust Mobilizations only
Other: Superficial Dry Needling
Upper Cervical Mobilizations
Active Comparator group
Description:
Active control
Treatment:
Other: Non-thrust Mobilizations only

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

David W Griswold, PhD

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems