Status
Conditions
Treatments
Study type
Funder types
Identifiers
About
This study aims to evaluate the effect of supervised incentive spirometry (SIS) compared to unsupervised incentive spirometry (Non-SIS) on pulmonary function in patients following coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. Participants perform incentive spirometry exercises twice daily for three days after extubation. Pulmonary function parameters, including forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), and peak expiratory flow (PEF), are assessed before and after the intervention period to compare changes between the two groups.
Full description
Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery is associated with an increased risk of postoperative pulmonary complications, such as atelectasis, pneumonia, and pleural effusion, which may impair pulmonary function. Incentive spirometry (IS) is commonly used as part of postoperative care to promote deep breathing, enhance alveolar recruitment, and improve lung volumes.
This quasi-experimental study is conducted at Dr. Hasan Sadikin General Hospital, Bandung, Indonesia, and enrolls patients who have undergone CABG surgery. Participants are consecutively assigned to one of two intervention groups: supervised incentive spirometry (SIS) or unsupervised incentive spirometry (Non-SIS).
Participants in the SIS group perform incentive spirometry exercises under direct supervision by healthcare personnel twice daily to ensure correct technique and adherence. Participants in the Non-SIS group perform the same exercises independently with routine reminders. Both groups receive a standardized postoperative cardiac rehabilitation program.
Pulmonary function is assessed using a portable spirometer measuring forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), and peak expiratory flow (PEF). Measurements are conducted at 24 hours post-extubation (T1) and after three days of incentive spirometry exercises (T2). The primary objective is to compare changes in pulmonary function parameters between the supervised and unsupervised groups.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
38 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal