Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
This trial evaluates the efficacy and safety of surfactant administration with thin catheter technique together with analgesic premedication in comparison with the established INSURE-strategy. It will provide valuable knowledge to improve clinical methodology and enhance lung protective treatment strategies for preterm infants.
Full description
To compare two approaches for surfactant administration during CPAP in preterm infants, the INSURE and the LISA technique, using premedication intubation protocols, and investigate aspects of safety, stress and pain, timely administration of the drug, response in oxygenation and pulmonary outcome.
Our study asks whether (P) among infants born <32 weeks' gestation with RDS (I) does surfactant administration with LISA and analgesia premedication (C) versus surfactant administration according to the INSURE protocol (O) improve oxygenation and reduce the rate of respiratory failure and need for intubation and mechanical ventilation (T) within 48 hours of the procedure
Primary outcomes:
Safety outcomes:
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Infants will be excluded from the final analysis if they have a congenital abnormality or condition that might have an adverse effect on breathing or ventilation, including: congenital diaphragmatic hernia; tracheo-oesophageal fistula or cyanotic heart disease.
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
160 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Mats Blennow, MD; Kajsa Bohlin, MD
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal