ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Surgery Alone Versus Neoadjuvant Treatment Followed by Surgery For MRI-defined T3 Mid-low Rectal Cancer

Sun Yat-sen University logo

Sun Yat-sen University

Status

Completed

Conditions

Rectal Cancer

Treatments

Procedure: total mesorectal excision

Study type

Observational

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT05496270
GIHSYSU-28

Details and patient eligibility

About

Neoadjuvant treatments (nCRT) are becoming the standard treatment for patients with stage II or stage III mid-low rectal cancer. In fact, with the introduction of total mesorectal excision, the local recurrence has been reduced significantly. Recently few studies have shown that surgery alone is enough for patients with T3 rectal cancer. These issues raised the question of whether nCRT is needed for all T3 rectal cancer patients. Therefore, this study was designed to compare the long-term oncological outcomes between surgery and surgery following nCRT among patients with MRI-defined T3, clear MRF mid-low rectal cancer.

Enrollment

1,509 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 80 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  1. Eighteen- to eighty-year-old patients.
  2. T3 rectal cancer with clear mesorectal fascia (MRF),
  3. within 12 cm from the anal verge at initial diagnosis by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)

Exclusion criteria

  1. emergency surgery due to bleeding, perforation, and bowel obstruction,
  2. recurrent rectal cancer,
  3. inflammatory bowel disease,
  4. Stage IV.

Trial design

1,509 participants in 2 patient groups

TME
Description:
patients only underwent TME
Treatment:
Procedure: total mesorectal excision
nCRT+TME
Description:
patients underwent TME following neoadjuvant treatment
Treatment:
Procedure: total mesorectal excision

Trial contacts and locations

0

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems