ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Surgical Approach of Hemiarthroplasty After Femoral Neck Fracture: Posterolateral or Direct Lateral (APOLLO)

J

JointResearch

Status

Completed

Conditions

Hemiarthroplasty
Hip Fractures
Posterolateral
Surgical Approach
Direct Lateral

Treatments

Procedure: Surgical approach

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT04438226
NL63378.100.17

Details and patient eligibility

About

Rationale: In the Netherlands the two main surgical approaches for hemiarthroplasty are the posterolateral and the direct lateral approach. Currently there is no conclusive evidence which of these two approaches results in better patient outcomes.

Objective: Assessing the patient outcome comparing the posterolateral with the direct lateral approach in patients being treated with cemented hemiarthroplasty after femoral neck fractures.

Study design: A randomised controlled multi-center superiority trial and natural experiment with an economic evaluation alongside.

Study population: All patients older than 18 years with a femoral neck fracture whereby treatment with cemented hemiarthroplasty is recommended according the national guidelines.

Intervention: Treatment with cemented hemiarthroplasty using the posterolateral approach.

Standard intervention to be compared to: Treatment with cemented hemiarthroplasty using the direct lateral approach.

Main study parameters/endpoints: The primary outcome is the patient-rated quality of life (EQ-5D-5L) at 6 months after surgery.

Secondary outcomes are: ADL functionality (KATZ), Balance test (SPPB), Tendency to Fall (FES-I), Pain (NRS), Re-interventions, Mobility, Discharge destination, Complications, and cost-effectiveness.

Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: The different approaches in the two treatment arms of the randomised controlled trial are widely used techniques in the Netherlands and many of the outcome measures are part of the standard clinical follow-up after hip fracture. Therefore, there is no extra risk or burden for participating patients, except for the time to complete some additional follow-up measurements. The primary outcome measurement and secondary outcomes, will be assessed through questionnaires online, by hardcopy or by phone at baseline, 4 weeks, 3 and 6 months postoperatively. The assessment of the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) balance test, will be performed by one of the study researchers or nurse practitioner to protect continuity and feasibility.

Enrollment

555 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • ≥ 18 years at time of trauma
  • Acute hip fracture
  • Hemiarthroplasty as recommended treatment according the national guidelines
  • Dutch or English fluency and literacy
  • Informed consent or by proxy in patients with mental impairment

Exclusion criteria

  • Multi-trauma-patient (ISS > 15)
  • Secondary surgery after failed internal fixation
  • Patients with a known metastatic disease and a confirmed pathological fracture of the hip
  • Fracture > 7 days at time of surgery
  • High risk of non-compliance/adherence to study procedures (e.g. no Dutch residency during follow-up period, or other factors that impair follow-up data collection)

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

555 participants in 2 patient groups

Posterolateral
Experimental group
Description:
Patients treated with a hemiarthroplasty using the posterolateral approach
Treatment:
Procedure: Surgical approach
Direct lateral
Experimental group
Description:
Patients treated with a hemiarthroplasty using the direct lateral approach
Treatment:
Procedure: Surgical approach

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems