Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
Objective: The comparison of surgical outcomes conventional hysterectomy and manipulator-assisted hysterectomy
Study design: Prospective randomized controlled trial. Allocation to either group occurred via computer-generated random numbers. Sequentially numbered, opaque envelopes were prepared according to randomization. The patients were unaware of whether they would undergo a conventional hysterectomy or manipulator-assisted abdominal hysterectomy for their surgical procedure. The research coordinator unveiled group assignments upon individual patient recruitment by opening the corresponding envelope.
Study population: Inclusion criteria were patients aged 40-70 years who underwent hysterectomy for benign gynecological indications.
Primary outcomes: (1) Operation Time.
Secondary outcomes: (1) Postoperative early pain (Visual Analog Score (VAS) at 6th and 24th hours of the surgery) (2) intraoperative complications, (3) postoperative complications
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
140 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal