ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Sustainable Financial Incentives To Improve Prescription Practices For Malaria

Duke University logo

Duke University

Status

Completed

Conditions

Malaria

Treatments

Behavioral: Performance based incentives

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT01809873
Pro00035154

Details and patient eligibility

About

This project aims to test an innovative, sustainable financial incentive designed to reduce the number of non-malarial fevers that are treated inappropriately with antimalarial drugs.

Full description

Global investments in controlling malaria have led to some exciting reductions in the burden of malaria. In some areas, malaria-related deaths have dropped by more than 90%. As malaria transmission declines, a greater fraction of pediatric fevers are from other causes. However, these fevers continue to be treated as malaria, often despite the availability of diagnostic testing. In a typical rural health facility in Kenya, more than 90% of febrile patients are prescribed an antimalarial when no diagnostic tests are available. Even when microscopy or rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are available, between 50-80% of patients with a negative test are nonetheless prescribed antimalarials. Inappropriately treated fevers in children can lead to serious consequences for the patient and can accelerate the spread of drug resistance. In addition to the risk to patients, overuse of antimalarials also puts a financial strain on the government health system. Although there is considerable incentive for governments to reduce drug costs and wastage, the financial pressure is not experienced at the appropriate levels of decision-making.

This project aims to test an innovative, sustainable financial incentive designed to reduce the number of non-malarial fevers that are treated inappropriately with antimalarial drugs. The study team will test a financial incentive targeted at the health facility to determine if it improves adherence to diagnostic results and clinical protocols. Eighteen rural health facilities in Western Kenya will be enrolled and randomly allocated to one of two arms. The study team will compare the effectiveness of clinical and technical training in diagnosis of malaria alone (Arm 1) to training plus financial incentives linked to prescription practices (Arm 2) in improving diagnosis and treatment of malaria and non-malaria fevers. The practice of prescribing antimalarials to patients with a negative diagnostic will be compared between facilities with and without the incentive structure. Secondary outcomes will include sensitivity and specificity of routine microscopy at health centers, use of alternative treatments for slide negative fevers, and frequency of stock-outs of antimalarial drugs.

This project will tackle an important implementation research problem. It seeks to test solutions to the problem of poor adherence to evidence-based clinical guidelines for malaria treatment, and thereby reduce inappropriate antimalarial drug use and drug wastage. This project will be conducted in collaboration with Kenya's Division of Malaria Control and avenues to roll-out the intervention, if successful, will be actively explored.

Enrollment

14,862 patients

Sex

All

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Health facility (level 3) in Western or Rift valley province, within the Academic Model Providing Access to Healthcare (AMPATH) catchment area
  • Consent from Provincial Medical Officer of Health, District Medical Officer of Health and Health facility in-charge
  • Functioning laboratory including microscopic diagnosis of malaria and at least one laboratory technician.

Exclusion criteria

  • Lack of consent from any level
  • Lack of adequate laboratory infrastructure or personnel

Trial design

14,862 participants in 2 patient groups

Performance based incentives
Experimental group
Description:
Performance based incentives: The Incentive arm will receive monthly visits and external quality assurance of malaria diagnostic accuracy, identical to the comparison. Incentive arm will also receive quarterly incentives linked to performance of the facility around six indicators of appropriate malaria case management
Treatment:
Behavioral: Performance based incentives
Comparison
No Intervention group
Description:
The comparison arm will receive monthly visits and monthly external quality assurance of malaria diagnostic accuracy.

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems