Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
Primary objective: To compare the safety and efficacy of closure strategies post venous access procedures.
Hypothesis: We anticipate that the use of a venous closure device will decrease the time to hemostasis (TTH), time to ambulation (TTA) and time to discharge (TTD) compared to conventional methods of closure following venous access procedure.
Full description
This study will be a prospective, randomized study of patients who are undergoing one or more of the following procedures at ASLMC (Aurora St. Luke's Medical Center):
Large-Bore Procedures >13 F
RANDOMIZATION:
Patients will be randomized into one of two venous closure groups after a clean stick has been achieved with no complications:
Large-bore (14F-25F) venous access group (1:1)
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Large-bore (>13F) Venous Access Procedures Inclusion Criteria:
All patients 18 years and older who are undergoing any of the following: WATCHMAN® device placement, atrial fibrillation ablation using cryoballoon or laser balloon, leadless pacemaker, Pulmonary embolism thrombectomy (Inari FlowTriever system), MitraClip transcatheter mitral valve repair at Aurora St. Luke's Medical Center from date of IRB (Institutional Review Board) approval through December 2022. All arterial line access should be radial.
Exclusion criteria
Large-bore (>13F) Venous Access Procedures Exclusion Criteria:
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
107 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal