ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Suturing Distance From the Wound Edge, 2 mm vs 5 mm

University of California (UC) Davis logo

University of California (UC) Davis

Status

Completed

Conditions

Cutaneous Sutures and Scar Cosmesis

Treatments

Device: Fast absorbing gut suture

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT03330041
1115596

Details and patient eligibility

About

This study aims to investigate whether the spacing of the interrupted cutaneous sutures affects surgical wound cosmesis on the face and neck. In other words, the investigators would like to determine which of the following yields a more cosmetically appealing scar: many closely approximated sutures or fewer, more widely spaced sutures. The investigators wish to compare the effects of two versus five millimeter spacing between sutures.

Full description

Sutures are the standard of care in repairing cutaneous wounds. The majority of surgical reconstructions following a Mohs micrographic surgery and standard surgical excisions require two layers of sutures: a deep (subcutaneous) layer and a top (cutaneous) layer. The deep layer dissolves naturally whereas the top layer may necessitate removal if non-absorbable sutures are used. This study aims to investigate whether the spacing of the interrupted cutaneous sutures affects surgical wound cosmesis on the face and neck. In other words, the investigators would like to determine which of the following yields a more cosmetically appealing scar: many closely approximated sutures or fewer, more widely spaced sutures. The investigators wish to compare the effects of two versus five millimeter spacing between sutures. It is possible that fewer, more widely spaced sutures may leave more open space in the wound, leaving more tension to pull on those few sutures, possibly encouraging the wound to dehisce and make it harder to approximate the wound edges yielding a less cosmetically appealing scar compared to placing many closely approximated sutures which would decrease the tension and likely better approximate the wound edges yielding a more cosmetically appealing scar. On the other hand, the investigators may find that suture spacing has no effect on wound cosmesis and that placing fewer, more widely spaced sutures is much more time efficient. The investigators may also find that the effect of suture spacing on wound cosmesis is dependent on wound tension. For example, perhaps the suture pacing would have no effect on the cosmesis of a wound under no tension, however, for a wound under high tension, it is possible that many closely approximated sutures would yield better cosmetic results for the reasons listed above.

Enrollment

50 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • 18 years of age or older
  • Able to give informed consent themselves
  • Patient scheduled for cutaneous surgical procedure on the trunk and extremities with predicted primary closure
  • Willing to return for follow up visit.

Exclusion criteria

  • Mentally handicapped
  • Unable to understand written and oral English
  • Incarceration
  • Under 18 years of age
  • Pregnant Women
  • Wounds with predicted closure length less than 4 cm

Trial design

Primary purpose

Other

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Single Group Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

50 participants in 2 patient groups

Fast absorbing gut suture placed 2 mm apart
Experimental group
Description:
Wound closed with sutures spaced 2 millimeters apart will be treated in a simple, interrupted cutaneous suture pattern
Treatment:
Device: Fast absorbing gut suture
Fast absorbing gut suture placed 5 mm apart
Experimental group
Description:
Wound closed with sutures spaced 5 millimeters apart will be treated in a simple, interrupted cutaneous suture pattern
Treatment:
Device: Fast absorbing gut suture

Trial documents
1

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems