ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Synthetic Cartilage Implant vs Osteochondral Autograft Transfer for Advanced 1st Metatarsal Phalangeal Joint Arthritis

University of Oklahoma (OU) logo

University of Oklahoma (OU)

Status

Withdrawn

Conditions

Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthritis

Treatments

Device: Synthetic Cartilage Implant
Procedure: Osteochondral Autograft Transfer

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT03489876
SynCartImp_Amin

Details and patient eligibility

About

This is a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial comparing synthetic cartilage implantation versus osteochondral autograft transfer for treatment of first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) arthritis. This data will allow for accurate comparisons between the two groups in regards to functional outcome, clinical outcome, pain relief, and complications.

Full description

First MTP joint arthritis or hallux rigidus is the most common arthritic condition of the foot. Historically, there have been several options to treat this condition surgically, but the current standard for advanced hallux rigidus is first MTP anthrodesis. Newer joint preserving procedures offer patients effective relief of pain and improving functional outcomes as well as maintaining, and potentially improving, range of motion for the first MTP joint. Osteochondral autograft transfer has been shown to be an effective treatment for hallux rigidus, and involves harvesting a small cylindrical osteochondral graft from a site remote of the first MTP joint and transferring the graft to the head of the first metatarsal. A new synthetic cartilage implant, Cartiva, has been shown to have equivalent functional outcomes, pain scores, and complications to anthrodesis, but the first MTP range of motion in the Cartiva group was maintained or even improved in some patients.

This is a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial comparing synthetic cartilage implantation versus osteochondral autograft transfer for treatment of first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) arthritis. The hypothesis is that clinical range of motion, pain scores, subjective clinical outcomes, and complications will not be clinically inferior with the synthetic cartilage implant group compared to the osteochondral autograft transfer group.

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 80 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Between the ages of 18 and 80 years old
  • Grade 2 or 3 hallux rigidus based on Coughlin and Shurnas classification
  • Presence of good bone stock as determined on pre-operative x-rays not requiring bone grafting
  • Capable of consenting for self

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients <18 years of age
  • Grade 1 or 4 hallux rigidus based on Coughlin and Shurnas classification
  • Active bacterial infection of the foot
  • Previous bilateral total knee arthroplasty
  • Previous fracture or significant trauma to the ipsilateral knee
  • Inflammatory anthropathy
  • Gout
  • Inadequate bone stock
  • Previous anthrodesis or arthroplasty performed on the ipsilateral first MTP

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

0 participants in 2 patient groups

Synthetic Cartilage Implant
Experimental group
Description:
Participants receive the synthetic cartilage implant. The synthetic cartilage implant that will be used is the Cartiva implant.
Treatment:
Device: Synthetic Cartilage Implant
Osteochondral Autograft Transfer
Active Comparator group
Description:
Participants receive the current standard osteochondral autograft transfer procedure.
Treatment:
Procedure: Osteochondral Autograft Transfer

Trial contacts and locations

0

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems