ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Systematic Sampling of Lymph Nodes vs. Lymphadenectomy According to Intraoperative Frozen Pathology for Pulmonary Invasive Adenocarcinoma With Ground-glass Opacity

S

Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Shanghai, China

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Lymph Node Excision

Treatments

Procedure: lymphadenectomy
Procedure: systematic sampling of the lymph-node

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT03322826
SHDC12015116

Details and patient eligibility

About

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of systematic sampling of lymph nodes vs. lymphadenectomy on outcome according to intraoperative frozen pathology for pulmonary invasive adenocarcinoma with ground-glass opacity (GGO) after VATS lobectomy.

Full description

On HRCT screening, early lung adenocarcinoma often contains a nonsolid component called ground-glass opacity (GGO). In 2011, pulmonary adenocarcinomas were classified into atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH), adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS), minimally invasive carcinoma (MIA) and more extensively invasive adenocarcinoma (IAC) [1]. Early adenocarcinomas with GGO-dominant always mean low-grade malignancy and have an extremely favorable prognosis [2-5]. Previous studies have shown that patients with AAH, AIS and MIA have excellent survival rates (5-year survival rate is approximate 95%) after resection, and only 0.83% - 2.91% patients have lymph node metastasis [6-9]. At present, lymphadenectomy is always undergone in patients with pulmonary adenocarcinoma with ground-glass opacity. However, for MIA patients (especially in T1a-b stage), the appropriate use of lymphadenectomy continues to be debated.

Nowadays, intraoperative frozen pathology is widely used during operation. However, whether sampling of lymph nodes or lymphadenectomy should be performed for GGO lesions according to intraoperative pathological diagnosis is unclear. The aim of this prospective study is to evaluate whether there are any trends regarding the impact of subtypes of invasive adenocarcinoma according to intraoperative frozen pathology in sampling of lymph nodes vs. lymphadenectomy.

Enrollment

600 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 80 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  1. A peripheral nodular lesion;
  2. The maximum diameters of whole GGO lesions and solid components on lung windows were no more than 3 cm (T1 stage);
  3. VATS lobectomy
  4. 25%≦Consolidation/Tumor ratio ≦50%
  5. ECOG performance status 0-2;
  6. Without distant metastasis;
  7. Intraoperative frozen pathology confirmed invasive or minimally invasive adenocarcinoma.
  8. No operation contraindication
  9. Cardiovascular: Cardiac function normal
  10. Renal: Creatinine clearance greater than 60 ml/min
  11. The expected survival after surgery ≥ 6 months
  12. Must be able to sign written informed consent form

Exclusion criteria

  1. Age less than 18 years old
  2. Known hereditary bleeding disorder with history of post-operative hemorrhage
  3. Patients maintained on chronic anticoagulation (eg Coumadin therapy)
  4. Known hematogenous disorder
  5. Known primary or secondary malignancy
  6. Pregnant or breast-feeding women;
  7. Clinically significant heart disease;
  8. Patients who are unwilling or unable to comply with study procedures;
  9. Receiving immunosuppressive therapy;
  10. HIV/AIDS.
  11. Multiple lesions in lung

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

600 participants in 2 patient groups

Lymphadenectomy
Active Comparator group
Description:
systematically Lymphadenectomy of the lymph-node stations ATS 2, 4, 7, 8, 9,10,11 on the right side and ATS 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,10,11 on the left side
Treatment:
Procedure: lymphadenectomy
systematic sampling of the lymph nodes
Experimental group
Description:
systematic sampling of the lymph-node stations ATS 2, 4, 7, 8, 9,10,11 on the right side and ATS 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,10,11 on the left side
Treatment:
Procedure: systematic sampling of the lymph-node

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

Chang Chen, M.D. Ph.D.

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems