ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Systemic Stress Prevention Via Application SysLife© for Companies

U

University of Witten/Herdecke

Status

Completed

Conditions

Application
Stress, Systemic
Stress, Psychological

Treatments

Behavioral: SysLife©, as intervention after closing the RCT-design
Behavioral: SysLife©

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT05828693
SysLife©

Details and patient eligibility

About

The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy of systemic stress prevention via SysLife© application in a prospective, interventive, balanced, monocentric, explanatory pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT), with participants' subjective stress experience as the primary endpoint.

Research Question: Which implementations are necessary, based on the experience from this pilot RCT, to ensure the quality of a subsequent confirmatory RCT?

Hypothesis: We expect improvement of participants' subjective stress experience, goal achievement, systemic functioning in private and organisational social systems while using the SysLife© application.

Full description

Background: Systemic prevention serves the prophylaxis of disease and/or illness, and/or damage to health. For social subsystems such as professional teams, there however still is a lack of effective preventive or health-promoting interventions. With the Prevention Act introduced in 2015 (Social Security Code, Germany: § 20 para. 1 SGB V), prevention now has to address the social context of people's everyday life as well ("setting/life-world approach"). Positive changes in terms of reduced stress perception or acute exposition to stress factors are supposed to be accompanied by improved systemic, psychological and physical well-being. This RCT will investigate the efficacy of the systemic stress prevention program SysLife© application.

Methods: This prospective, interventive, balanced, monocentric, explanatory pilot RCT compares an experimental group (n = 19) receiving SysLife© application with a control group (n = 19) with subsequent intervention, i.e. the SysLife@ application 4 months after the experimental group. The primary endpoint is the participants' subjective stress experience.

The data collection encompasses 5 measurement points: t1, i.e. baseline for the experimental group; t2: 2-month follow-up; t3: 4-month follow-up for the experimental group and baseline for the control group; t4: 6-month follow-up for the experimental group and 2-month follow-up for the control group; t5: 8-month follow-up for the experimental group and 2-month follow-up for the control group).

This allows for the calculation of trends considering the potential efficacy of the SysLife© application in the RCT design on the one hand (n = 19, 2-study arm approach), and in a cumulative study (n = 38, 1-study arm approach).

Research Question: Which implementations are necessary, based on the experience from this pilot RCT, to ensure the quality of a subsequent confirmatory RCT?

Hypothesis: We expect improvement of participants' subjective stress experience, goal achievement, systemic functioning in private and organisational social systems while using the SysLife© application.

Questionnaires: Stress and Coping Inventory (SCI); Trier Stress Inventory (TICS); Experience in Social Systems (EXIS), Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS). Further items: demographic data, use of additional health care interventions, user behavior and effect of the SysLife© application.

Discussion: To the best of our knowledge, this will be the first prospective, interventive, balanced, monocentric, explanatory pilot RCT comparing SysLife© application with a waiting group. For study purposes, it is a challenge to implement SysLife© application in organizational contexts such as teams: systemic prevention is an innovative health-promoting approach which is not (yet) covered by the German health insurance companies; the SysLife© application is an innovative program in digital health management with high flexibility how to approach it while being standardized in its structure; though companies are increasingly interested in health-promoting interventions for their employees, they are sparing considering the investment of time and financial resources in occupational health care.

Enrollment

49 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Minimum age: 18 years
  • Interest in active use of the SysLife© application
  • Knowledge of German at native language level or the ability to use German language independently (at least B-level)
  • Only persons capable of giving consent will be included in the study
  • Written consent to participate after information about the study

Exclusion criteria

  • No written consent

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

49 participants in 2 patient groups

Experimental group
Experimental group
Description:
Use of the SysLife© application, with 2-, 4-, 6- and 8-month follow-up.
Treatment:
Behavioral: SysLife©
Waiting group with subsequent intervention
Other group
Description:
Use of the SysLife© application after 4-month waiting period, with 2- and 4-month follow-up.
Treatment:
Behavioral: SysLife©, as intervention after closing the RCT-design

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

Magdalena Wendt, B.Sc.; Christina Hunger-Schoppe, Prof. Dr.

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems