T-prf Versus T-prf and Low-level Laser Stimulation on Bone Healing at Posterior Mandibular Fractures

Alexandria University

Status

Completed

Conditions

Posterior Mandibular Fractures

Treatments

Other: T-PRF

Other: T-PRF and Laser biomodulation

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT06970379

0855-02/2024

Details and patient eligibility

About

Different types of grafting substances have been used in the recent decade to accelerate bone healing at large bony facial defects. PRF was one of the gold standard materials to be used until it was replaced by its successor T-PRF due to the PRF hazards of preparation. However, T-PRF- still can't stand alone in full bone enhancement procedure. Therefore, the combination with another bone bio-modulation technique, like Low-level Laser Therapy, is a must to approach the full advantage of bone healing. Aim: To compare between the effect of using T-PRF versus T-PRF with Low Level Laser stimulation on bone healing at posterior mandibular fractures

Enrollment

14 patients

Sex

All

Ages

20 to 40 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

Patients suffering from posterior mandibular fracture

Exclusion criteria

Patients with an untreated old Mandibular fracture.
Patient with hematological diseases (thrombocytopenia, hemorrhagic disease, and diabetes).
Comminuted fracture with bone loss.
There is an infection at the fracture line.