ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Tacking Mesh Versus Self-fixating Mesh for Inguinal Hernia Repair

Mayo Clinic logo

Mayo Clinic

Status

Completed

Conditions

Hernia, Inguinal

Treatments

Device: PROLENE Polypropylene Tacking Mesh
Device: ProGrip Self-fixating Mesh

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT03247985
13-003616

Details and patient eligibility

About

Investigators are testing whether tacking mesh or self-fixating mesh used for inguinal hernia repair makes any difference in short-term pain or return to normal activities following the operation. Other studies have shown no significant difference in hernia recurrence rate when metal tacks are not used to hold the mesh in place.

Full description

Participants will be placed into two groups. One group of participants will have mesh tacked into place for their hernia repairs. The other group will have self-fixating mesh into place. Both groups will have a piece of mesh that will widely cover the hernia defect. Before surgery, the participant will be asked to rate discomfort on a 0-10 scale. Zero stands for no pain and 10 is the worst pain they can imagine. Investigators will record information about general medical condition, medications and activity level. During the operation information will be recorded about the pain medicines the participant may receive. In the recovery room the participant will be asked to rate their pain on the 0-10 scale and more information will be recorded about any additional pain medicines that they may receive and assess activity level. Following surgery, Investigators will contact the participants by survey to obtain more information about pain level, medication use, and activity level.

Enrollment

38 patients

Sex

Male

Ages

18 to 65 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • All patients regardless of sex or age who were diagnosed with a inguinal hernia and underwent a totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota from June 2013 - June 2014.

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients who did not elect to undergo a hernia repair or who elected to undergo a different type of hernia repair instead of a TEP procedure.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

38 participants in 2 patient groups

PROLENE Polypropylene Tacking Mesh
Active Comparator group
Description:
Participants will be randomized to Tacking Mesh for their inguinal hernia surgery.
Treatment:
Device: PROLENE Polypropylene Tacking Mesh
ProGrip Self-fixating Mesh
Active Comparator group
Description:
Participants will be randomized to Self-fixing mesh for their inguinal hernia surgery
Treatment:
Device: ProGrip Self-fixating Mesh

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems