ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Taperloc Complete Microplasty vs Taperloc Complete Standard: Randomized Controlled Study on Bone Mineral Density (taperloc)

Zimmer Biomet logo

Zimmer Biomet

Status

Completed

Conditions

Legg-Perthes Disease
Traumatic Arthritis
Osteoarthritis
Avascular Necrosis
Rheumatoid Arthritis

Treatments

Device: Taperloc Complete Standard
Device: Taperloc Complete Microplasty

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Industry

Identifiers

NCT02087436
INT.CR.GH3.13

Details and patient eligibility

About

The primary purpose of this study is to measure the postoperative changes in bone mineral density, comparing the Taperloc Complete Reduced Distal Microplasty stem and the standard length Taperloc Complete Reduced Distal stem.

Full description

The Taperloc Microplasty cementless stem is designed to transmit load to the proximal femur, thereby preserving bone density, and preventing long term instability and loosening secondary to proximal bone resorption. The primary aim of this study is therefore to compare the postoperative changes in bone density with the Taperloc Microplasty stem, using the standard length Taperloc stem as a control.

In addition, the Taperloc stem has historically had a neck angle of 138°. There have been criticisms that this neck angle is too high for the typical Korean population. The newer Taperloc Complete system (both Microplasty and standard length) has a neck angle of 133°. A secondary aim is Occurrence ratio of thigh pain difference between Microplasty and standard stem in Korean Population

Enrollment

100 patients

Sex

All

Ages

20 to 80 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients suitable for primary Total Hip Replacement

Patients with degenerative joint disease (inflammatory or non-inflammatory) or any of the composite diagnoses of:

  1. Osteoarthritis
  2. Avascular necrosis
  3. Legg Perthes
  4. Rheumatoid Arthritis
  5. Diastrophic variant
  6. Fused hip
  7. Sequelae of Slipped capital epiphysis
  8. Traumatic arthritis
  9. Patients aged over 20
  10. Patients must be able to understand instructions and be willing to return for follow-up

Exclusion criteria

  • Absolute contraindications include: infection, sepsis, and osteomyelitis.

Relative contraindications include:

  1. uncooperative patient or patient with neurologic disorders who are incapable of following directions,
  2. Small Femoral canal
  1. Severe osteoporosis (Patients over 65 years old) 3) metabolic disorders which may impair bone formation, 4) osteomalacia, 5) distant foci of infections which may spread to the implant site, 6) rapid joint destruction, marked bone loss or bone resorption apparent on roentgenogram, and 7) vascular insufficiency, muscular atrophy, or neuromuscular disease. 8) pregnancy 9) Fracture of the pelvis 10) Subcapital fractures

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

100 participants in 2 patient groups

Taperloc Complete Standard
Active Comparator group
Description:
Group one will receive a total hip replacement with Taperloc Complete Standard. Taperloc Complete Standard is designed after the philosophy of a flat tapered wedge. It has evolved to incorporate the Reduced Distal and Microplasty stems to better address all patient anatomies, and facilitate multiple surgical techniques.
Treatment:
Device: Taperloc Complete Standard
Taperloc Complete Microplasty
Active Comparator group
Description:
Group one will receive a total hip replacement with Taperloc Complete Microplasty.Taperloc Complete Microplsty cementless stem is designed to transmit load to the proximal femur, thereby preserving bone density, and preventing long term instability and loosening secondary to proximal bone resorption.
Treatment:
Device: Taperloc Complete Microplasty

Trial documents
1

Trial contacts and locations

2

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2025 Veeva Systems