Status
Conditions
Treatments
Study type
Funder types
Identifiers
About
The goal of this study is to learn whether receiving personalized, digital lifestyle advice during colorectal cancer screening leeds to changes in lifestyle over a two-year follow-up period. Changes will be measured using a composite score including diet, alcohol consumption, physical activity, body mass index and smoking habits. The main questions it aims to answer are:
Researchers will compare three groups which receive digital feedback at different intensities and a control group which does not get any feedback to see if lifestyle changes differ between the groups.
Participants in four different groups will fill in a digital diet and lifestyle questionnaire at the start of the study and 2-4 times after this during the following 2 years.
A secondary goal of the study is to understand whether the invitation to fill in the diet and lifestyle questionnaire affects participation in colorectal cancer screening. Therefore, a fifth group of individuals invited to colorectal cancer screening but not to be invited to fill in the questionnaire will be included for extra comparison. Participation in colorectal cancer screening will be compared between this group and the four groups that are additionally invited to complete the questionnaire.
Another secondary goal is to learn which groups in the society consent to the current study. Therefore, sociodemographic characteristics will be compared between the invited individuals who consent and those who do not consent to the study.
Full description
This is a five-armed, parallel group randomized controlled trial (RCT) among participants invited to the national colorectal cancer screening programme in Norway (ColorectalScreen Norway). The aim of the trial is to test the effect of intervention with a digital, personally tailored diet and lifestyle feedback (Digikost report) on dietary and lifestyle changes in colorectal cancer screening participants. Additionally, it is an aim to gain knowledge on feasibility and acceptability of the digital diet and lifestyle assessment and feedback at colorectal cancer screening setting.
PRIMARY AIM The main aim is to study the effect of the intervention on 2-year changes in a healthy lifestyle score.
SECONDARY AIMS:
To study:
RANDOMIZATION AND THE STUDY ARMS The study will randomize a total of 16,000 individuals invited to ColorectalScreen Norway in a defined time period into the following five arms (1:1:1:1:1): three intervention arms (arm A, B and C), a control arm and an arm not receiving an invitation to the study ("usual care", i.e. usual screening service).
A total of 12,800 colorectal cancer screening invitees will be invited to one of the four trial arms (a control arm and three intervention arms, 3,200 invitees in each arm).
The study arms consist of 19 Hospital Trust strata: Finnmark, Helgeland, Innlandet, Førde, Sørlandet, Telemark, Fonna, Ahus, Bergen, Møre og Romsdal, OUS, Vestre Viken, Østfold, Stavanger, Nordland, Vestfold, UNN, St. Olavs and Nord-Trøndelag. As the randomization in this study is stratified, ColorectalScreen Norway invitees are first divided into strata, and then randomly assigned to one of the five arms. The study has a parallel group design, meaning there are no crossovers between the five arms.
INTERVENTION The intervention in this study is digital individually tailored advice to follow the Norwegian food-based dietary guidelines, including recommendations on physical activity, body weight and avoidance of tobacco.
In the three intervention arms (A, B and C), the participants are asked to complete digital assessment of diet and lifestyle (Digikost questionnaire) at different intensities during the 2-year intervention period.
The digital personalized advice (Digikost report) will be made available and sent automatically to the participant's e-mail immediately after completing the Digikost questionnaire. The intervention will last for up to 2 years, with the number of questionnaire rounds and intensity depending on the study arm. The intensities in the three arms will be:
Intervention arm A: Invitation to complete Digikost questionnaire sent at baseline and after 6 months. The digital advice in the Digikost report will be made available for the participant in an e-mail sent immediately after completion of the Digikost questionnaire at baseline, but not after 6 months.
Intervention arm B: Invitation to complete Digikost questionnaire sent at baseline and after each 6 months through the intervention period, in total four times. The digital advice in the Digikost report will be made available for the participant in an e-mail sent immediately after completion of the Digikost questionnaire.
Intervention arm C: Invitation to complete Digikost questionnaire sent at baseline and after each 6 months through the intervention period, in total four times. The digital advice in the Digikost report will be made available for the participant in an E-mail sent immediately after completion of the Digikost questionnaire. At baseline, the participant will additionally be offered an individual consultation telephone meeting with a healthcare provider, scheduled to take place shortly after the baseline assessment. Information of this offer will be given after completion of the questionnaire. Additionally, the participants will be invited, through e-mail, to inspirational webinars on cancer preventive lifestyle every 6 months, with possibilities for submitting questions prior to the seminar.
The Digikost report will be made available for the participants in the intervention arms A, B and C also after the 2-year Digikost questionnaire at the end of the study period. This, however, is not part of the intervention, but rather a reward for the participants.
COMPARATOR The first comparator (the Control arm) will be invited to complete the digital lifestyle questionnaire at baseline, after 6 months and 2 years, but will not receive any feedback. The second comparator (the "Usual care" arm) is the current standard of practice in ColorectalScreen Norway. The Usual care arm will not receive any questionnaire or feedback.
For one of the secondary aims (sociodemographic participant vs. non-participant characteristics), the group of individuals who complete the questionnaire at baseline will be compared with the group of individuals who do not complete the questionnaire.
ENDPOINTS The primary endpoint, for comparison between Intervention arms A, B and C and Control arm is change in a healthy lifestyle score, which consists of the 2018 WCRF/AICR Score and smoking status. This is defined as difference in the score for each participant assessed at baseline and after the 2-year intervention period. The 2018 WCRF/AICR Score is a point score based on the participant's answers in the Digikost questionnaire. Zero to one point is given for the grade to which the participant complies to each of the seven health recommendations: 1) normal body weight, 2) physical activity, 3) diet rich in wholegrains, vegetables, fruit and beans, 4) limited intake of 'fast foods' and other processed foods high in fat, starches or sugars, 5) limited consumption of red and processed meat, 6) limited consumption of sugar-sweetened drinks, and 7) low alcohol consumption. The 2018 WCRF/AICR Score thus ranges from 0 to 7 points. Added by one score point for smoking status, the healthy lifestyle score will range from 0 to 8 points.
SECONDARY ENDPOINTS
DATA FROM OTHER SOURCES
THE QUALITATIVE STUDY In order to determine the acceptability of introducing a rapid lifestyle assessment with personalized feedback into the national CRC screening program, the researchers will perform a formative evaluation.
A longitudinal qualitative study will be conducted among a subsample of the intervention group. Individual interviews using semi-structured interview guides will be used to collect the participant's perceptions of the acceptability of completing the Digikost and receiving personalized feedback within the context of the CRC screening, as well as whether they found the feedback motivating. The participants will be followed-up a month after the first interview to collect their motivation and experiences with implementing any lifestyle changes based on the personalized advice.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
16,000 participants in 5 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Ane S. Kværner, PhD; Paula Berstad, PhD
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal