TDCS and Aphasia Therapy in the Acute Phase After Stroke

Ghent University Hospital (UZ)

Status: Terminated

Conditions: Aphasia Following Cerebral Infarction

Treatments: Device: tDCS; Device: Sham-tDCS; Behavioral: Aphasia therapy

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT03297450

EC2017/0906

Details and patient eligibility

About

This study evaluates the neuromodulatory effect of combined tDCS and aphasia therapy in patients in the acute stage after stroke. Half of the participants will receive aphasia therapy and tDCS, the other half will receive aphasia therapy and sham-tDCS.

Full description

Aphasia is present in about one third of all stroke patients in the acute phase. The first few months after stroke, considerable spontaneous recovery is initiated, including neuronal plasticity and reorganization processes. Language recovery in aphasic stroke patients involves reorganization of brain functions. Longitudinal fMRI studies reveal that the right hemisphere shows increased activity at different times in the recovery process, but in the long-term is correlated with poorer performance. Left re-lateralization, if possible, seems to be the most effective in restoring language function. For a large subgroup of patients, aphasia therapy is not sufficient to resolve language deficits and not all patients are capable to endure intensive aphasia therapy. Therefore, non-invasive techniques (NIBS) such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) are currently explored as an add-on treatment to improve or accelerate therapy outcomes. tDCS is a painless and safe stimulation tool that modulates cortical excitability through weak polarizing currents (1 mA - 2 mA) between two electrodes. These weak currents are thought to induce a subthreshold shift of resting membrane potentials towards depolarization or hyperpolarization. The effects of stimulation depend on the polarity of the applied current relative to the axonal orientation. It has been found that tDCS not only triggers immediate aftereffects, but also long-lasting effects that persist beyond the stimulation time, even for up to 12 months. It was suggested that long-term potentiation (LTP) and long-term depression (LTD) might be responsible for these long-term effects, however the precise physiologic mechanisms of action are not yet fully understood.

Enrollment: 1 patient

Sex: All

Ages: 18 to 85 years old

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• Diagnosed with mild-moderate aphasia (Token Test Score between 7 and 40)
• Inclusion in the first few days after stroke (acute phase)
• Age 18 - 85 years
• Being right-handed
• Mothertongue: Dutch
• Able to undergo functional and specific linguistic testing and therapy in the acute phase following stroke
• Imaging (CT or MRI) prior to inclusion (standard of care)
• Signed Informed Consent

Exclusion criteria

• History of other diseases of the central nervous system, psychological disorders and (developmental) speech and or language disorders
• Serious non-linguistic, cognitive disorders (as documented in the patients' medical history and inquired in anamneses)
• Prior brain surgery
• Excessive use of alcohol or drugs

Trial design

Primary purpose: Treatment

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: Triple Blind

---

1 participants in 3 patient groups

Aphasia therapy and tDCS

Active Comparator group

Treatment:

Behavioral: Aphasia therapy

Device: tDCS

Aphasia therapy and sham-tDCS

Sham Comparator group

Treatment:

Device: Sham-tDCS

Behavioral: Aphasia therapy

Standard of care and sham-tDCS

Sham Comparator group

Treatment:

Device: Sham-tDCS