Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the use of a state-of the art internet psycho-educational program in clinical practice (Teens-Connect), compared to use of a standard and widely available internet diabetes program for youth (Planet D™) in a mixed-method randomized clinical trial design.
Full description
The aims are:
To evaluate the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of provider-prescribed Teens-Connect (TEENCOPE™+Managing Diabetes) in pediatric diabetes practice compared to prescription of Planet D™.
The hypotheses to be studied are:
Youth who participate in Teens-Connect will have better metabolic control (A1c) and quality of life (QOL) than those who participate in Planet D. These effects will be mediated by improvements in stress/coping, self-efficacy, diabetes problem-solving, and self-management. Teens-Connect prescribed by providers in diabetes clinics will be a cost-effective approach to reduce A1c and improve quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) for youth with T1D. To compare the reach, efficacy, adoption, implementation, and maintenance (RE-AIM) of the two provider-prescribed psycho-educational internet programs.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
*Previous exposure to TEENCOPE and/or Managing Diabetes
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
124 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal