Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate vs. Entecavir in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients With Partial Virologic Response to Entecavir (STEEP)

Korea University

Status and phase: Completed; Phase 4

Conditions: Chronic Hepatitis B

Treatments: Drug: tenofovir; Drug: entecavir

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other; Industry

Identifiers

NCT01711567

STEEP study

Details and patient eligibility

About

Entecavir, a potent antiviral agent, has been widely used for treatment-naïve chronic hepatitis B patients. However, about 20% of patients showed partial virologic response after 2 year of entecavir therapy (33% in HBeAg positive, 10% in HBeAg negative patients). Tenofovir is a nucleotide analogue with more potent antiviral activity. In addition, there is no cross resistance between the two drugs. Therefore it is assumed that tenofovir would be effective in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B patients who shows partial virologic response (detectable HBV DNA by real time PCR after 12 months of treatment) despite treatment with entecavir. In this study, we will compare the efficacy of switching to tenofovir with continuing entecavir in patients who shows partial virologic response to entecavir.

Full description

The number of patients needed was calculated using PASS 2008. We hypothesized that two-thirds (65%) of the patients receiving TDF, and one-fifth (20%) of the patients receiving ETV, would achieve virologic response. We also assumed a 15% drop-out rate; thus, 22 patients were needed in each group to achieve 80% power to demonstrate a difference between the groups with a 5% level of significance.

The primary efficacy end point will be analyzed on a per-protocol basis, including only those patients who had completed the treatment schedule of study. In contrast, the intention-to-treat analysis will include all randomized subjects, even those dropped-out from the study before 12 months, as cases of treatment failure.

Enrollment: 60 patients

Sex: All

Ages: 19+ years old

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

1. CHB patients (positive HBsAg more than 6 months)
2. Age 19 years old
3. HBeAg positive or negative patients
4. Patients receiving entecavir 0.5 mg more than 12 months
5. Detectable HBV DNA by real time PCR (HBV > 60 IU/mL)
6. Compensated liver function (Child-Pugh-Turcotte score ≤7, prothrombin time 3 sec above ULN or INR ≤1.5, serum albumin >3 g/dL, total bilirubin <2.5 mg/dL, no history of variceal bleeding, diuretics or ascites requiring paracentesis, hepatic encephalopathy)

Exclusion criteria

1. History of treatment with nucleotide analogue other than 0.5 mg of ETV
2. Serum creatinine level > 1.5 mg/dL or creatinine clearance < 50 mL/min
3. Absolute neutrophil count ≤ 1000 cell/mL
4. Hemoglobin level ≤ 10 g/dL in men or ≤ 9 g/dL in women
5. Antiviral resistance mutations on rtT184, rtS202, or rtM250 + rtM204V/I
6. A positive antibody test for human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis C virus, or hepatitis D virus
7. Pregnancy or lactation
8. HCC (in cases where alfa-fetoprotein levels were over 100 ng/mL, abdominal computed tomography or magnetic resonance image was performed to exclude HCC)
9. Untreated malignancy other than HCC.

Trial design

Primary purpose: Treatment

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: None (Open label)

---

60 participants in 2 patient groups

entecavir

Active Comparator group

Description:

standard drugs

Treatment:

Drug: entecavir

tenofovir

Active Comparator group

Description:

study drugs

Treatment:

Drug: tenofovir