Testing the Impact of Smartphone-based Messaging to Support Young Adult Smoking Cessation

Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health

Status: Enrolling

Conditions: Tobacco Cigarette Smoking

Treatments: Behavioral: Smartphone-based intervention messages

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT05836103

IRB00013413

Details and patient eligibility

About

Clinical practice guidelines for smoking cessation emphasize cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) to help patients develop coping strategies for urges. Mindfulness or Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) offer a different approach, which teaches smokers psychological flexibility through accepting negative experiences. While there is evidence for the efficacy of both CBT and Mindfulness/ACT smoking cessation interventions, it is unclear if these approaches are efficacious when implemented in real-time and with young adults. The overall goal of this proposal is to evaluate the efficacy of CBT and Mindfulness/ACT messages for young adults targeted at specific high-risk situations for smoking.

Full description

This research will address the following specific aims:

Aim 1: To test CBT and Mindfulness/ACT intervention message efficacy for reducing momentary smoking urges (N=80). To inform just-in-time interventions, it is crucial to test if CBT and Mindfulness/ACT based messages can reduce momentary smoking urges. The investigators will conduct a micro-randomized trial (repeated within-subject randomizations of messages) to accomplish this. In line with the investigators' existing protocol, participants first collect Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) data for 14 days, allowing the investigators to determine high-risk situations for smoking. In the following intervention phase, participants receive tailored messages triggered by geofencing of participants' high-risk locations for a total of 30 days. Tailoring is based on established predictors of smoking relapse (stress and presence of other smokers). The micro-randomized trial tests the efficacy of CBT versus Mindfulness/ACT versus control messages for reducing smoking urge 15 minutes post message delivery. Secondary outcomes include smoking or other tobacco use (including e-cigarettes), affect, and stress.

Aim 2: To test if exposure to urge reduction messages results in changes in smoking behavior over time compared to an EMA only control group (N=80). It is important to investigate if repeated messages in the micro-randomized trial impact smoking behavior over time, in contrast to just repeated assessment without messages. Thus, this study includes a conventionally randomized clinical-trial component. Parallel to the micro-randomized trial group, a control group completes EMA surveys only without intervention messages. This allows the investigators to test if messages reduce smoking behavior. The primary outcome is number of cigarettes per day at end of treatment, 3-, and 6-months follow-up. Secondary analyses explore biochemically verified 7-day point prevalence abstinence, switching to e-cigarettes, and other tobacco outcomes. Post-hoc dose-response analyses investigate the long-term efficacy of CBT or Mindfulness/ACT messages on smoking behavior.

Aim 3: Explore moderation effects of substance co-use (cannabis, alcohol, other drugs) and exposure to specific location (home, work, bars) on urge reduction message efficacy. A crucial research question to inform future mobile interventions is how well intervention messages work in different situational contexts and when people are co-using other substances. Among intervention group participants, the investigators will explore how urge reduction message efficacy may be moderated by substance co-use and exposure to specific settings.

Enrollment: 160 estimated patients

Sex: All

Ages: 18 to 30 years old

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

1. live in the U.S.
2. read English;
3. are between 18 and 30 years of age;
4. own an iPhone or Android smartphone;
5. have smoked ≥100 cigarettes in their lives and currently smoke at least 3 cigarettes per day on 5 or more days of the week;
6. are planning to quit smoking within the next 30 days.

Exclusion criteria

• None

Trial design

Primary purpose: Treatment

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: None (Open label)

---

160 participants in 2 patient groups

Micro-randomized trial group

Experimental group

Description:

The micro-randomized trial will determine if CBT and Mindfulness/ACT messages are superior to control messages in reducing the primary outcome momentary smoking urges. Based on participants' training data collected in the initial 14 days of EMA monitoring, intervention messages will be delivered during time-periods and at high-risk locations for smoking. In the intervention phase, participants will be prompted to complete 3 geofence-triggered EMAs per day for a total of 30 days. Each EMA will be followed by an intervention message and the type of message (CBT, Mindfulness/ACT, control) will be randomly selected at each time point (within-subject randomization).

Treatment:

Behavioral: Smartphone-based intervention messages

EMA-only control group

No Intervention group

Description:

A total of N=80 participants will be randomized into an EMA-only control group, parallel to the micro-randomized trial intervention group. This group will conduct 14-day EMA only training phase just like the micro-randomized trial group, but will not be switched over to the intervention phase after these initial 14 days. Instead, participants will continue the EMA-only data collection procedure for an additional 30-days (analogous to the 30-day intervention phase of the micro-randomized trial). During these 30 days, the EMA-only control group will continue to receive 3 randomly prompted EMA surveys per day and an additional 3 EMA surveys triggered by smoking reports.