ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Teta Burst Versus 10 Hz Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation İn Neuropathic Pain: A Sham Controlled Comparison

A

Ankara City Hospital

Status

Completed

Conditions

Neuropathic Pain

Treatments

Device: Magstim Rapid2 Magnetic Stimulator

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT06197113
AnkaraCHBilkent_ozgearar

Details and patient eligibility

About

Neuropathic pain is a common complication after spinal cord injury (SCI), which significantly affects the patient's quality of life and may be resistant to pharmacological treatment. In our study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacies of intermittent theta burst (iTBS) and high frequency (10 Hz) repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) by comparing them with each other and with sham stimulation, in the treatment of neuropathic pain resistant to pharmacological treatment in patients with SCI.

Question 1: İs rTMS anda iTBS treatment, useful for pain severity and the effect of pain on daily functions, in the treatment of neuropathic pain in SCI Question 2: Are rTMS and iTBS treatments effective in depression in patients with neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury?

Full description

Pharmacological treatments may be insufficient to limit neuropathic pain. Therefore, research continues for safe and effective new treatments. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation method that modulates the cortical excitability of the motor area to which it is applied. Theta Burst stimulation (TBS) is a new rTMS method consisting of stimulation sequences in a special pattern. It stands out with its ability to deliver high pulses in a short time and its high capacity to induce cortical plasticity. Intermittent TBS (iTBS) and high frequency rTMS facilitate excitability in the motor area where it is applied, and this effect is used in pain treatment. Pain modulation with these methods has been tried in some studies. Therefore, repetitive magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex by these two methods may be good options for the treatment of neuropathic pain resistant to pharmacological treatment in patients with SCI.

Enrollment

26 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 65 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Between the ages of 18-65,
  • Traumatic/Non-traumatic spinal cord injury (>4 months),
  • For >3 months, despite pharmacological treatment (no dose or medication changes have been made for at least 1 month), Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)-Part 1 average pain score is ≥4/10, neuropathic pain at the injury level and/or below (DN4 ≥4 /10) patients

Exclusion criteria

  • Pain attributed to causes other than neuropathic pain (e.g. musculoskeletal pain, pain resulting from diabetic polyneuropathy), Having a history of epilepsy, dementia, cognitive impairment, neurodegenerative disease,
  • Having a history of psychiatric illness (except reactive depression),
  • Having a lesion in the brain due to vascular, traumatic, tumoral or infectious reasons,
  • Having a history of alcoholism,
  • Having an intracranial metallic implant,
  • Having a cardiac pacemaker,
  • Pregnant patients

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

26 participants in 3 patient groups

10 Hz rTMS group
Active Comparator group
Description:
To the patients in the high frequency (10 Hz) rTMS (n:9) group, 110% resting motor threshold (rMT), 10 Hz frequency stimulation, 5-second stimulation, and then a total of 30 trains and 1500 pulses at 25-second intervals were applied for 15 minutes while targeting the lower extremity motor area.
Treatment:
Device: Magstim Rapid2 Magnetic Stimulator
iTBS group
Active Comparator group
Description:
To the patients in iTBS group (n:9), three bursts of stimulation at 50 Hz, repeated every 200 milliseconds, were delivered for 2 seconds every 10 seconds, totaling 600 stimuli at MT intensity, applied for a duration of 200 seconds.10 sessions was applied while targeting the lower extremity motor area.
Treatment:
Device: Magstim Rapid2 Magnetic Stimulator
Sham Group
Sham Comparator group
Description:
The patients in the sham group (n:8) were given sham stimulation with a sham coil for 10 sessions.
Treatment:
Device: Magstim Rapid2 Magnetic Stimulator

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2024 Veeva Systems