ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

The 3-Dimensional Printed Guide in Endodontic Microsurgery

D

Damascus University

Status

Completed

Conditions

Endodontic Disease
Endodontic Re-treatment Failure

Treatments

Other: Conventional Endodontic Micro-Surgery
Device: 3-D printed Guide

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT05283252
UDDS-Endo-01-2022

Details and patient eligibility

About

In recent years, there was a great interest in employing the surgical guide in dentistry due to the development occurred in the 3D printing which became available widely.

Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is necessary and crucial in planning for endodontic surgery, but the procedure still depends on how the surgeon reflect the 3D images on the anatomical structures accurately, which may leave room for error.

This study is to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes using guided endodontic microsurgery versus conventional endodontic microsurgery in critical anatomical structures.

Full description

Endodontic microsurgery in critical anatomical structures is considered as a serious challenge for the endodontist.

Major advances have been made to the techniques used in endodontic surgery to make the procedure easier to perform, safer and more predictable.

Several case reports that used surgical guide in endodontic microsurgery found that the procedure was more accurate in control of depth, diameter and angle of osteotomy.

The aim of this study is to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes using guided endodontic microsurgery versus conventional endodontic microsurgery in critical anatomical structures.

Patients will be selected that they are indicated for endodontic surgery. Upper and lower teeth will be selected close to critical anatomy such as; maxillary sinus, nasal fossa, mental foramen and mandibular canal. medical and dental history will be obtained from all selected patients. Patients will be randomly distributed to either guided micro-surgery group or conventional micro-surgery group. All steps of the surgical procedure will be performed under microscopic magnification. Bioceramic putty will be used as a root-end filling material. Post-surgical instructions will be given to patients. The time of the surgery will be recorded from the first incision to the last suturing. Success and failure will be assessed using radiographic and clinical evaluation at 6 and 12 months.

Enrollment

26 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 50 years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients in good general health.
  • Patients with age ranging between 18-50 years.
  • Posterior/anterior teeth close to critical anatomical structures that indicated for endodontic surgery.
  • Patients' acceptance to participate in the trail.

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients with allergy to materials or medications used in the trial.
  • Patients with Serious systemic disease incompatible with surgery.
  • Pregnant female patients.
  • Teeth with periapical pathosis associated with vertical root fracture.
  • Non-restorable teeth.
  • Teeth with periodontal probe more than 5 mm.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Double Blind

26 participants in 2 patient groups, including a placebo group

Guided Endodontic Micro-Surgery
Experimental group
Description:
Use of the 3-D printed guide in endodontic micro-surgery
Treatment:
Device: 3-D printed Guide
Conventional Endodontic Micro-Surgery
Placebo Comparator group
Description:
Free-hand endodontic micro-surgery
Treatment:
Other: Conventional Endodontic Micro-Surgery

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

Thuraya Lazkani, DDS,MSc,PhD; Rami Kaddoura, DDS,MSc

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2025 Veeva Systems