ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

The Accuracy of Reconstruction of Orbital Walls Fracture Using Prebent Mesh Versus Patient Specific Implant

T

Tanta University

Status

Completed

Conditions

Orbital Fractures

Treatments

Device: reconstruction of orbital walls

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

Details and patient eligibility

About

under GA, incision to access to orbital walls. Then insertion of prebent titanium mesh or customized titanium implant and fixation with miniscrews, examination of ocular motility using forced duction test followed by closure of flap.

Full description

under GA, incision to access to orbital walls. complete reflection of orbital floor to be constructed then insertion of customized orbital implant of patient or insertion of titanium mrsh after adaption on the model and fixation with miniscrews, examination of ocular motility using forced duction test followed by closure of flap.

Enrollment

20 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 55 years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • patient had fractured orbital walls suffering from enophthalmous, hypoglobus, diplopia

Exclusion criteria

  • systemic disease interfere with bone healing enophthamous less than 2 mm

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

20 participants in 2 patient groups

prebent titanium mesh
Experimental group
Description:
reconstruction of fractured orbital walls with perbent titanium mesh
Treatment:
Device: reconstruction of orbital walls
customized titanium implant (patient specific implant)
Experimental group
Description:
econstruction of fractured orbital walls with patient specific implant (customized titanium implant)
Treatment:
Device: reconstruction of orbital walls

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems