The ARRC III Trial of Advanced Recovery Room Care (ARRC). (ARRCIII)

University of Adelaide

Status

Enrolling

Conditions

Post-Surgical Complication

Economic Problems

Treatments

Other: Usual Care

Other: ARRC

Study type

Observational

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT05836285

17557

Details and patient eligibility

About

A postoperative high-acuity model of care (ARRC) has been shown, in a prospective cohort study of approximately 850 patients, to produce a marked improvement in patient and hospital outcomes, and hospital costs, in medium risk patients (Ludbrook G et al., JAMA Surgery 2023).

The goal of this observational study is to examine the outcomes after non-cardiac surgery of a larger group of medium risk patients receiving different forms of care -ARRC and usual ward care. The main questions it aims to answer are:

what are the outcomes for patients and hospital after the different forms of care, who receives benefit from high acuity care, what underlies the improved outcomes seen with high acuity care.

Full description

Demand for essential surgery is growing, yet we face an increasingly complex casemix and budget challenges. New paradigms to deliver high value care are essential.

Advanced Recovery Room Care (ARRC) is a model of care which, at RAH, has been shown to provide substantial improvements in patient outcomes, hospital utilisation, and costs of care. Specifically, it showed when compared to usual ward care: improved Days at Home after Surgery (primary outcome), decreased in-hospital complications, and decreased mortality at 1, 3 and 12 months. This model was cost-effective compared to usual ward care: ICER of approximately -$250 per DAH

It is essential to collect high quality data on this model relevant to consumers and hospitals, in order to:

provide a robust mechanism to ensure outcomes are maintained, and ideally improved, within our institution
provide a mechanism to potentially allow benchmarking in the future, across institutions
better identify which surgical subgroups receive benefit from ARRC
provide a resource to generate and test hypotheses as to how these benefits are achieved.

To that end, the ARRC II study database is to be refined to function in essence as an ongoing registry.

This will be initially piloted at RAH, the subject of this study.

Enrollment

3,000 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

Scheduled for elective or unplanned surgery
Scheduled to stay in hospital at least one night after surgery
30-day mortality of 0.5% to 8% by the US National Safety and Quality Improvement Program risk score (NSQIP)

Exclusion criteria