ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

The Cancer Home Life Intervention Study. A Randomised, Controlled Multicentre Trial and a Health Economic Evaluation

University of Southern Denmark (SDU) logo

University of Southern Denmark (SDU)

Status

Completed

Conditions

Quality of Life
Cancer
Activities of Daily Living
Palliative Care
Everyday Activities

Treatments

Other: The Cancer Home Life Intervention

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

Details and patient eligibility

About

The purpose of this study is to examine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the Cancer Home Life Intervention compared to usual care on performance of and participation in everyday activities and quality of life in people with advanced cancer living at home.

Full description

The sample size is based on the primary outcome measure: the mean Activty of Daily Living (ADL) motor ability 1.04 logits (SD 0.727) as measured by the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS). A significance level of 0.05 would provide 80% power to detect a between-group difference of 0.3 logits requiring a sample size of N=184. An expected drop-out rate of 32% at 3 months follow-up means that 272 patients with advanced cancer must be included in the study from three hospitals.

Multiple imputation will be used to estimate a plausible value for missing data of participants that are lost to follow-up due to other reasons than death. This does not, however, apply to the primary outcome data where no estimations will be computed.

For normally distributed ratio data the intervention group will be compared with the control group using multiple linear regression analysis of mean changes from baseline. Logistic regression analysis will be used for ordinal data. Adjustments for hospital and for baseline values will be made. A modified intention-to-treat analysis will be applied. Subgroup analyses to identifiy groups that especially benefit from the intervetnion will be performed.

The cost-effectiveness analysis wil be performed with ADL motor ability as the clinical parameter, and the cost-utility analysis will be based on the calculation of Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALY). The Incremental Cost-effectiveness Ratio (ICER) will be calculated and the results summarised in a cost-effectiveness acceptability curve (CEAC).

Enrollment

242 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • ≥18 years old
  • Diagnosed with cancer
  • Evaluated incurable by responsible oncologist in respective out-patient unit
  • Functional level 1-2 on the WHO performance scale
  • Live within a radius of maximum 60 km from AUH or NH or on the island of Funen
  • Live in a private home or in sheltered living
  • Know sufficient Danish to fill out questionnaires and participate in interviews.

Exclusion criteria

  • Cognitive impairment preventing the participants from participating in a structured interview
  • Live in a nursing home or a hospice
  • Considered incapable of complying with the trial

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Double Blind

242 participants in 2 patient groups

The Cancer Home Life Intervention
Experimental group
Description:
One or more of the following: * prioritisation of resources and everyday activities * adaptation of activities * adaptation of posture and seating positioning * provision of assistive devices * modification of the physical home environment And usual care from hospital and municipality
Treatment:
Other: The Cancer Home Life Intervention
Control
No Intervention group
Description:
Usual care from hospital and municipality

Trial contacts and locations

2

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems