Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
To evaluate the clinical efficacy (safety, feasibility and long-term efficacy) of robotic radical total gastrectomy and laparoscopic radical total gastrectomy in patients with locally advanced middle and upper gastric adenocarcinoma (CT2-4A, N-/+, M0) .
Full description
In the field of gastrectomy, Hashizume et al. first reported robotic gastrectomy in 2002. Since then, reports on the safety and feasibility of the application of robotic surgical system in the treatment of gastric cancer (GC) have gradually increased. Reports of robotic surgery for GC are increasing, especially in Asia. Several studies confirmed the advantages of robotic gastrectomy when compared with laparoscopic gastrectomy. However, whether robotic radical total gastrectomy is noninferior to laparoscopic radical total gastrectomy remains unclear. The investigator first carried out this study in the world to evaluate the efficacy of robotic radical total gastrectomy versus laparoscopic radical total gastrectomy for GC.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
1.Age between 18 and 75 years 2.The primary gastric lesion was histopathologically diagnosed as middle and upper gastric adenocarcinoma (papillary adenocarcinoma PAP, tubular adenocarcinoma TUB, mucinous adenocarcinoma MUC, signed-ring cell carcinoma SIG, poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma POR) by endoscopic biopsy.
3.Preoperative clinical stages were CT2-4A、 N-/+、and M0 (according to AJCC-8th TNM tumor staging) 4.Excepting to perform radical total gastrectomy and D2 lymph node dissection can achieve R0 resection.
5.American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score class I, II, or III 6.Written informed consent
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
570 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Hua-long Zheng, MD; Chang-ming Huang, MD
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal