Status and phase
Conditions
Treatments
Study type
Funder types
Identifiers
About
The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and effectiveness of dosing mesalazine 800 mg tablets (Asacol®) at 2.4 g once daily versus divided doses three times daily in the maintenance of remission of ulcerative colitis.
Full description
Study design
Subject population
Test Product
Once daily group: Asacol® 2.4g daily given as three 800mg tablets orally qAM
Three times daily group: Asacol® 2.4g daily given as one 800mg tablet orally three times daily
Criteria for Evaluation:
Primary Outcome Variable: Relapse rate over 1 year in the intention to treat population, with the study powered to detect non-inferiority of the once-daily regimen.
Secondary Outcome Variables: assessment of superiority of the once-daily regimen, if non-inferiority is demonstrated; safety analysis; per protocol analysis of relapse rate; time course of relapse; medication compliance; changes in modified Baron sigmoidoscopy scores between trial entry and relapse/12 month; impact of various factors on relapse rate (time from last relapse at study entry, concomitant azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine therapy; disease extent; disease duration; smoking status; age at diagnosis; previous dose of mesalazine; baseline calprotectin; baseline CRP level).
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Patients who meet the following criteria will be eligible for study entry:
Male and female patients aged over 18 with ulcerative colitis confirmed by histology who are in remission (no symptoms of active disease, and modified Baron sigmoidoscopic score of 0 or 1)
If female, must be (as documented in patient notes):
Patients whose ulcerative colitis has been in clinical remission for 4 weeks or longer, and who have had a symptomatic relapse within the past two years
Patients taking mesalazine, sulfasalazine or other drug containing 5-ASA for 4 weeks or longer
Patients capable of giving written informed consent
Exclusion criteria
The following patients will be excluded from the study:
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
213 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal