Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
The study is designed to evaluate two different dietitian-led self-management approaches in carbohydrate counting compared to routine dietary care (control) on glycaemic control in adult patients with type 1 diabetes:
The main hypothesis is that structured training and education in either the BCC concept or the ABC-ACC concept will reduce HbA1c or the average glucose variability more than routine dietary education.
Full description
The current study is a randomized controlled trial with a parallel-group design. A total of 231 patients will be enrolled in the trial. Participants will be randomized to one of three arms: 1) Basic carbohydrate counting (BCC), 2) Advanced carbohydrate counting with an automated bolus calculator (ABC-ACC), or 3) Standard dietary care.
The primary objective is to evaluate the six months effects of education in the BCC concept and the ABC-ACC concept compared to standard dietary care on glycaemic control as assessed by HbA1c or MAGE (mean amplitude of glycaemic excursions).
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
63 participants in 3 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal