Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
Based on the findings of our formative work, conduct a one-year intervention among African American Adults using revised culturally tailored materials to examine differences in Healthy Eating Index (HEI) and type 2 diabetes (T2DM) risk factors among participants (n=198) randomized to one of the 3 dietary patterns:
1) Healthy U.S.-Style Eating Pattern, 2) Healthy Mediterranean-Style Eating Pattern, and 3) Healthy Vegetarian Eating Pattern.
Full description
The U.S. Dietary Guidelines (USDG) form the basis of federal nutrition programs and policy and provide valuable guidance to health initiatives and industries. The updated 2015 USDG moved away from a focus on individual nutrients to a greater focus on dietary patterns. The USDG state that healthy eating goals can be met through a variety of dietary patterns, but present healthy diet in three main ways: 1) Healthy U.S.-Style Eating Pattern, 2) Healthy Mediterranean-Style Eating Pattern, and 3) Healthy Vegetarian Eating Pattern. Currently, US adults are falling short of the nutrition recommendations (fruit/vegetable intake, greens/beans, whole grains, etc.) set forth by the USDG and measured by the Healthy Eating Index (HEI). While the USDG are the basis of nutrition guidelines, the research informing these dietary pattern recommendations has largely been drawn from observational studies among mostly white populations. In addition, there has been very limited cultural-tailoring of these dietary patterns that would ensure that these diets are acceptable to diverse populations, in particular, African Americans (AAs) living in the south, who experience a disproportionate burden of chronic disease, especially type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Currently, US adults are not meeting nutrition recommendations (fruit/vegetable, whole grains, etc.) set forth by the USDG and measured by the Healthy Eating Index (HEI).
For this study, AA adult participants with overweight/obesity and ≥three T2DM risk factors will be recruited to participate in the following aim:
Based on the findings of our formative work, conduct a one-year intervention using revised culturally tailored materials to examine differences in HEI and T2DM risk factors among participants (n=198) randomized to one of the 3 dietary patterns. This will result in community-based strategies around presenting dietary guidelines in a way to effectively meet nutrition recommendations leading to significant impacts on health among AA adults.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
should not be pregnant (or have been pregnant in the last 6 months), anticipating on becoming pregnant in the next 12 months, or currently breastfeeding
o Women who are pregnant should not be pursuing weight loss and should be under the direct care of a physician. Therefore women who are pregnant or who are anticipating they might be pregnant should not participate in this study. If a woman becomes pregnant during the study, she will be advised to consult with her healthcare provider and will be dropped from the weight loss study.
should be free of an eating disorder as screened by the Eating disorder Screen for Primary care [ESP]. (If a participant has an eating disorder, they will be given contact information for the eating disorder clinic at the University of South Carolina)
no current participation in a weight loss program or taking weight loss medications (although participants may be trying to lose weight on their own)
no recent or planned bariatric surgery
no recent weight loss (>10 lbs in the last 6 months)
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
198 participants in 3 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Taylor Duncan, BS
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal