ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

The Difference Between Non-invasive High-frequency Oscillatory Ventilation and Non-invasive Continuous Airway Pressure Ventilation in COVID-19 With Acute Hypoxemia

G

Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Disease

Status

Not yet enrolling

Conditions

COVID-19 Pneumonia
Non-invasive Ventilation

Treatments

Device: Non-invasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation
Device: Non-invasive continuous positive airway pressure ventilation

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT05706467
GYFYY-202301

Details and patient eligibility

About

High frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV), as an ideal lung protection ventilation method, has been gradually applied to neonatal intensive care treatment, and is currently recommended as a rescue method for neonatal acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) after failure of conventional mechanical ventilation. Although its ability to improve oxygenation and enhance carbon dioxide (CO2) clearance has been repeatedly demonstrated in laboratory studies, its impact on the clinical results of these patients is still uncertain. Noninvasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (nHFOV) combines the advantages of HFOV and non-invasive ventilation, and has become the current research focus in this field. It is recommended to use it after the failure of routine non-invasive ventilation treatment to avoid intubation. For the treatment of intubation, there is still a lack of large-scale clinical trials to systematically explore its efficacy. The gradual increase of clinical application of nHFOV has also enriched its application in the treatment of other diseases. At present, non-invasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation has not been applied to the study of adult COVID-19 with acute hypoxemia, which will be the first study in this field.

Enrollment

20 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  1. After COVID-19 nucleic acid detection, imaging confirmed COVID-19;
  2. Age ≥ 18 years old;
  3. At the time of admission, the blood gas was acute hypoxic respiratory failure, the fraction of inhaled oxygen concentration (Fio2) was at least 0.40, but the blood oxygen saturation (Spo2) was 94% or lower;
  4. Be able to follow the instructions of the researcher.

Exclusion criteria

  1. Critically ill patients: cardiac and respiratory arrest, requiring tracheal intubation; Multiple organ failure (>2 organs);
  2. Hemodynamic instability;
  3. After extubation of invasive mechanical ventilation;
  4. Patients who cannot wear a mask, such as maxillofacial or upper airway surgery;
  5. Patients who may affect the treatment effect of NPPV, such as nasal obstruction or upper respiratory tract obstruction;
  6. Obvious bullae, pneumothorax and pleural effusion;
  7. It is accompanied by obvious other respiratory diseases, such as bronchiectasis and lung cancer;
  8. Those who refuse to participate in this test.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Non-Randomized

Interventional model

Single Group Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

20 participants in 2 patient groups

non-invasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation
Experimental group
Description:
The day before the test, the patient was titrated with the oxygen concentration under non-invasive ventilation. The non-invasive continuous positive airway pressure ventilation was used, the pressure was set at 8cmH2O, and the oxygen concentration was titrated when the blood oxygen saturation was greater than 92% during non-invasive ventilation, and the oxygen concentration in the respiratory tube was constant after the test. In non-invasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation mode, maintain the same positive airway pressure setting, and superimpose high-frequency oscillatory airflow with amplitude of 6cmH2O and oscillatory frequency of 10HZ.
Treatment:
Device: Non-invasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation
continuous positive airway pressure ventilation
Active Comparator group
Description:
The patient was titrated with non-invasive ventilator-related parameters and oxygen uptake concentration the day before the test, and the parameter setting was maintained in the formal experiment.
Treatment:
Device: Non-invasive continuous positive airway pressure ventilation

Trial contacts and locations

0

Loading...

Central trial contact

Rongchang Chen, M.D.; Jianyi Niu, M.D.

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2025 Veeva Systems