Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
Prospective, controlled, double randomized, non-blinded, multicenter, investigator initiated, academic superiority trial comparing optical coherence tomography (OCT) guided vs. angiography guided wire recrossing in jailed side branches (SB) (1. randomization 1:1)(superiority) and comparing Medtronic Resolute Integrity and Xience Prime for stent strut apposition in the SB ostium (2. randomization 1:1) (superiority). Acute primary endpoint and 30 days clinical follow-up.
Hypothesis: OCT guided wire recrossing in bifurcation stenting results in less malapposed struts in the segment facing the SB ostium.
Secondary hypothesis: Treatment by Medtronic Resolute Integrity stent results in less malapposed struts at the bifurcation segment compared to treatment by the Abbott Xience Prime stent.
Full description
Purpose:
To assess the ability of OCT to guide wire recrossing and reduce stent strut malapposition after kissing balloon dilatation.
To compare stent strut apposition after treatment by two different stent designs using both guiding strategies of wire recrossing.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
60 participants in 4 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Evald H Christiansen, MD; Niels R Holm, MD
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal