Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
The planned study aims to contribute to the existing literature by comparatively evaluating the effects of online and face-to-face laughter yoga interventions on nurses, focusing on stress, sleep quality, and burnout. In line with this purpose, the research hypotheses are as follows:
H1. Laughter yoga intervention provided to nurses has a positive effect on their perceived stress levels.
H2. Laughter yoga intervention provided to nurses has a positive effect on their sleep quality.
H3. Laughter yoga intervention provided to nurses has a positive effect on their burnout levels.
H4. There is a significant difference between the effects of online and face-to-face laughter yoga interventions.
Full description
This study investigated whether laughter yoga can help reduce stress, improve sleep, and prevent burnout among nurses. Nurses often work in challenging conditions with long shifts, which can negatively affect their mental and physical health. In this study, nurses were divided into three groups: one received face-to-face laughter yoga, another participated in laughter yoga online, and the third group did not receive any intervention.
Laughter yoga sessions were conducted twice a week for two weeks and included deep breathing, playful activities, and laughter exercises. Participants completed surveys before and after the sessions to measure their stress levels, sleep quality, and signs of burnout.
The results showed that nurses who participated in the online laughter yoga program experienced better sleep, felt less emotionally exhausted, and had a stronger sense of personal accomplishment. These benefits were not observed in the face-to-face or control groups. Interestingly, the program did not significantly reduce stress levels in any of the groups.
This study suggests that online laughter yoga may be a useful and accessible tool to support the well-being of nurses, especially in healthcare settings where in-person wellness programs are difficult to organize.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
40 participants in 3 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Özge TOPSAKAL, PhD
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal